Teams

FYC Ausherman

2025 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Summer Weekend · 7.5 M Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 3.81 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-13vs Deercreek CC jaxTigersWon 20
W#1 DoublesWills McVicker / Alex Nixon vs Jagadesh Rajan / KUMARESAN NATARAJAN6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Rechcigl / Jason Decker vs Rajasekar Srinivasan / Vancheeswaran Jeyaraman6-4, 6-4
2025-08-07vs Deercreek CC jaxTigersWon 21
W#1 DoublesWills McVicker / Alex Nixon vs Praveen Subramanian / Kishore Arunachalam6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Rechcigl / Jason Decker vs Sathish Kumar Ingersal / Jagadesh Rajan4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFrank Morreale / Chris Chewning vs Bhanu Dhungana / KUMARESAN NATARAJAN6-0, 7-5
2025-07-19vs Julington Creek CarrLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Williams / Charles Duss vs Tanmay Jethanandani / Jackson Carnaghi1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGary Wheeler / Chris Chewning vs Joao Sarpi / James ODwyer5-7, 1-2
L#3 DoublesChristopher Nuland / Brent Henning vs Matthew Davis / Pedro Enrique Kreitz Martinez6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Wills McVicker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Alex Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Charles Duss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
BRYAN Clontz
published 4
3.69
Matt Ausherman
published
3.65
Frank Morreale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Christopher Nuland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
JD Reeder
published 3.5
3.31
Brent Henning
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Chris Chewning
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jason Decker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jeremy Susac
published
Kevin Rechcigl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JD Reeder + Chris Chewning224 matchesnot enough data
Wills McVicker + Alex Nixon303 matchesnot enough data
BRYAN Clontz + Frank Morreale123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wills McVicker
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Alex Nixon
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Charles Duss
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
4
BRYAN Clontz
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Matt Ausherman
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Frank Morreale
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Christopher Nuland
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
JD Reeder
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Brent Henning
23W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Chris Chewning
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Jason Decker
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeremy Susac
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Rechcigl
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.