Teams

Team 11 Slice Girls

2024 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.07 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-22vs Team 9 Westwood WolfpackLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaria Costea / Paula Garrison vs Ashley Nguyen / Erin West4-6, 4-2
2024-09-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCatie Cummings / Sueyun Hsieh vs Shelley Gaffin / Kendra Doveala2-6, 4-6
2024-09-10vs Team 10 WGCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatie Cummings / Kere Harper vs Katherine Price / Elizabeth Gooch1-6, 1-6
2024-08-25vs Team 2 Net JobsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatie Cummings / Sueyun Hsieh vs Jessie Tappel / Elham Tavassoli2-6, 0-6
2024-08-17vs Team 8 TrifectaLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatie Cummings / Paula Garrison vs Jaimie Galbreath / Dara Okamoto0-6, 1-6
2024-08-11vs Team 3 Deuces WildWon 10
W#1 DoublesSueyun Hsieh / Maria Costea vs Jane Ignacio / Adriana Lee6-0, 6-2
2024-07-26vs NOVA - DeVitoLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaula Garrison / Maria Costea vs Tara Reynolds / Karyn DeVito3-6, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Sueyun Hsieh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Paula Garrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Maria Costea
published
3.00
Freda Moore
published 3
2.94
Catie Cummings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Noeline Arul
published
2.31
Stacy Smith
published
Bhavna Patel
published 2.5
2.18
Olivia Bowers
published
1.71
Catie Dugan Vargas
published 2.5
Young Choi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Costea + Paula Garrison134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sueyun Hsieh
141W–113L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Paula Garrison
115W–102L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Maria Costea
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Freda Moore
36W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
Catie Cummings
59W–105L career · 4 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.94
Noeline Arul
16W–46L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.88
3
Deborah Oelschlager
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacy Smith
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Bhavna Patel
2W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Olivia Bowers
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Catie Dugan Vargas
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.71
Young Choi
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.