Teams

SDNC 3.5WE Scripps Trails/ Garcia

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC WE · SDNC - Women- WE 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-15vs SDNC 3.5WE La Costa/ PasqualiniLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa McDonald / Caresse Muir vs Janine Aldover / Elizabeth Romero7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-08vs SDNC 3.5WE Kit Carson Park/ NelsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesKiersten Bousquet / Jennifer Johnson vs Diane Thornton / Heidi Dalvie2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKiersten Bousquet / Bianca Riggio vs Jennifer Hackett / Annie Ruttenber3-6, 2-6
2025-05-18vs SDNC 3.5WE RPTC/ EreneaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStacey Griffin / Melanie Bowyer vs Junli Feng / Yekaterina Smotrich3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCaresse Muir / Kiersten Bousquet vs Carole Farr / Julie Read7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKiersten Bousquet / Jennifer Johnson vs Cristina Seidman / Nichole Dolinsky5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women- WE 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kirsten Barton
published
3.29
Lisa McDonald
published
3.20
Heather Lemon
published 3
3.11
Giovanna Reinking
published
3.08
Kiersten Bousquet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Melanie Bowyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Caresse Muir
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Sally Myungok Yeem
published
3.00
Maureen Ford
published
2.89
Tricia Barnes
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caresse Muir + Kiersten Bousquet101145% gamesnot enough data
Caresse Muir + Tricia Barnes314 matchesnot enough data
Caresse Muir + Melanie Bowyer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirsten Barton
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Lisa McDonald
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3
Heather Lemon
130W–102L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Giovanna Reinking
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
3.5
Kiersten Bousquet
78W–88L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Melanie Bowyer
15W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Caresse Muir
64W–78L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Sally Myungok Yeem
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Maureen Ford
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Tricia Barnes
34W–43L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.