Teams

BBTC - KNIGHT/BAUGHMAN

2025 Mixed 55 & Over-GC · 3.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-17vs Myrick 55 - OSTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohnny Frazier / Amy Knight vs David Spencer / Kim Lyons6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMarty Warren / Laurie Baughman vs Trista Nash / Charlie Neumann6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDouglas Vaughn / Cindy Creel vs David Rodriguez / Jennifer Mitchell3-6, 3-6
2025-07-15vs Newman-TOCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnne Warren / David Boggs vs Lisa Chapman / William Moore1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLee Ann Hunter / Douglas Vaughn vs Mary Ashbaker / Robbie Johnson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-08vs Diamondhead - WilkersonLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Boggs / Amy Knight vs Rhonda Lohmeyer / Jan Lohmeyer6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMike Cooper / Laurie Baughman vs Cheryl King / Freddie Wilkerson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDavid Baughman / Cindy Creel vs Karen Wilkerson / Michael Wellman1-6, 3-6
2025-07-07vs Diamondhead - WilkersonLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaurie Baughman / David Baughman vs Jo Ann Lozes / Michael Wellman5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Knight / David Boggs vs Karen Wilkerson / ED LOZES7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Warren / Douglas Vaughn vs Cheryl King / Freddie Wilkerson1-6, 2-6
2025-06-24vs Newman-TOCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesLee Ann Hunter / Marty Warren vs Lisa Chapman / John Cleary2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJaime Denmark / David Baughman vs Connie Johnston / Chris Ashbaker5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBetsy Taylor / Douglas Vaughn vs Toni Fillmore / James Whitney6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-17vs Diamondhead - WilkersonLost 12
W#1 DoublesLee Ann Hunter / Marty Warren vs Rhonda Lohmeyer / Jan Lohmeyer7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCindy Creel / David Boggs vs Pamela Hymel / William Warren1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Knight / Mike Cooper vs Karen Wilkerson / Freddie Wilkerson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-05vs Myrick 55 - OSTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAmy Knight / David Boggs vs John Greer / Jennifer Mitchell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaurie Baughman / David Baughman vs Ellen Berry / Charlie Neumann6-7, 6-7
2025-06-03vs Newman-TOCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMike Cooper / Lee Ann Hunter vs Mary Ashbaker / Robbie Johnson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDouglas Vaughn / Betsy Taylor vs Connie Johnston / Jim Sukiennik5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Baughman / David Baughman vs Carolyn Freeman / Chris Ashbaker6-1, 6-4
2025-05-13vs Myrick 55 - OSTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Baughman / Laurie Baughman vs John Greer / Kim Lyons4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDouglas Vaughn / Cindy Creel vs David Rodriguez / Trista Nash6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDavid Boggs / Jaime Denmark vs Harold Roberts / Jan Roberts6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Diamondhead - Wilkerson72161127225
2BBTC - KNIGHT/BAUGHMAN36111636276
3Myrick 55 - OSTC27101737275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Jaime Denmark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Johnny Frazier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Laurie Baughman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Marty Warren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
David Baughman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Lee Ann Hunter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.64
Betsy Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Anne Warren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.41
David Boggs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.40
Cindy Creel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Douglas Vaughn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mike Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Baughman + Laurie Baughman1544% gamesnot enough data
Lee Ann Hunter + Mike Cooper314 matchesnot enough data
Marty Warren + Laurie Baughman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jaime Denmark
45W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Johnny Frazier
47W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Laurie Baughman
22W–38L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
Marty Warren
27W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
David Baughman
10W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Lee Ann Hunter
17W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Betsy Taylor
13W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Anne Warren
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
David Boggs
8W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
3
Cindy Creel
3W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40
Douglas Vaughn
4W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Cooper
30W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.