Teams

Powers-GCC

2025 Adult 18 & Over-DLT · Women 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-08vs Myers-CCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesLizzie Powers / Sarah Waldrop vs Chloe Darden / Lane Purvis0-6, 3-6
2025-05-04vs Boykin-CCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Waldrop / Claire Smith vs Kathryn Boykin / Beth Joel6-7, 4-6
2025-04-29vs Boykin-CCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Waldrop / Kristen Pennington vs Blair Campbell Taylor / Beth Joel3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMary Killebrew / Jessica Barnes vs Heather Sledge / Megan Belenchia2-6, 0-6
2025-04-17vs Aylward/Shannon-CCCLost 02
L#2 DoublesLindsay Powers / Mary Killebrew vs Mari Micci Bramuchi / Taylor Ward5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMerritt Reichle / Kerri McQueen vs Destiny Livingston / Brittany Bowen0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-13vs Hamrick-Bear PenLost 01
L#1 DoublesBetsy Belk / Mary Killebrew vs Brianne DeLoach / Courtney Howarth1-6, 3-6
2025-04-07vs Hamrick-Bear PenLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Waldrop / Betsy Belk vs Amanda Azlin / Heather Gholson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Killebrew / Kristen Pennington vs Callie Gordon / Michie Cotton2-6, 1-6
2025-04-06vs Myers-CCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatie Buford / Sarah Waldrop vs Ashley Cox / Katherine Swafford6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Sarah Waldrop
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.99
Lindsay Powers
published
Cindy Tyler
published 3
2.71
Merritt Reichle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Mary Killebrew
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Kerri McQueen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
MaryNeff Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerri McQueen + MaryNeff Stewart0534% games−8.8% vs expected
Kerri McQueen + Mary Killebrew123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Waldrop
15W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Lindsay Powers
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Cindy Tyler
4W–17L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Merritt Reichle
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Mary Killebrew
13W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.61
Kerri McQueen
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
MaryNeff Stewart
7W–25L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.