Teams

BC-MCC/NissaDiederich3.0

2026 SoCal Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

24 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · BC Women - 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-SouthEnd/BridgetParrilla3.0000000
2BC-MiraCosta/KarenNolan3.0000000
3BC-ErnieHowlett/LanVera3.0000000
4BC-WestEnd/TerriDiamond3.0000000
5BC-MiraCosta/KarieLanterman3.0000000
6BC-MCC/NahiaHossain3.0000000
7BC-AltaVista/JoAnnIshii000000
8BC-MCC/NissaDiederich3.0000000
9BC-Kramer/ReneeRoyles3.0000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
KARYN EILBER
published
3.03
LIsa Cook
published
2.98
Neeraj Rotondo
published
2.95
Heather Baboolal
published
2.95
Jinous Hamidi
published
2.95
Nissa Diederich
published
2.95
Shefali Rao
published
2.94
2.93
Janine Higbie
published
2.91
Jenny Peterson
published
2.91
Elizabeth Riddell
published
2.91
Zoe Frank
published
2.83
Kenna Davis
published
2.83
Ashley Goldsmith
published 3
2.83
Brittany Phillips
published
2.80
Nicole Pacourek
published
Andrea Barry
published 3
2.69
2.55
Czarina Roxas
published 3
2.52
Lindsay Strazicich
published
Katie Boand
published
Kristen Neer
published
Nicola Harrison
published
Sonia Simms
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

KARYN EILBER
14W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
LIsa Cook
13W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Neeraj Rotondo
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Heather Baboolal
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Jinous Hamidi
10W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Nissa Diederich
10W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Shefali Rao
16W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Kristine Marlborough
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Janine Higbie
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Jenny Peterson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91
Elizabeth Riddell
12W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Zoe Frank
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91
Kenna Davis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Ashley Goldsmith
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Brittany Phillips
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Nicole Pacourek
9W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Andrea Barry
5W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Cambria McCulloch
11W–10L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Czarina Roxas
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Lindsay Strazicich
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Katie Boand
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Neer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicola Harrison
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sonia Simms
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.