Teams

Fee - Prior

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-27vs EFSC - OhlinWon 10
W#1 SinglesNicole Kendrick vs Calli Ohlin6-1, 6-2
2026-05-20vs Brevard/WoodsLost 03
L#1 DoublesNicole Kendrick / Ashley St Vil vs Linda Mesnard / Michelle Lawley1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesInez Prior vs Danielle Carlson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMadeline Calise / Carri Prior vs Amanda Mccaughin / Catherine Ferreira6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-05-13vs Kiwi - KonradLost 01
L#2 DoublesMargaret Kendrick / Nicole Kendrick vs Katey Benne / Lee Rocque6-7, 5-7
2026-05-06vs Suntree - RezaWon 21
L#1 DoublesMadeline Calise / Nicole Kendrick vs Wendy Paul / Michelle Lax6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesInez Prior vs Maria Reza6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAshley St Vil / Margaret Kendrick vs Megha Bhatia / Mary Overton6-2, 6-2
2026-04-15vs Brevard/WoodsLost 12
W#1 DoublesInez Prior / Natalie Happ vs Linda Mesnard / Catherine Ferreira6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Kendrick vs Michelle Kne4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMargaret Kendrick / Ashley St Vil vs Lynn Barratt / Michelle Lawley3-6, 5-7
2026-04-11vs Kiwi - KonradWon 10
W#2 DoublesAshley St Vil / Nicole Kendrick vs Pam Mcfadden / Lisa Sexton6-4, 6-4
2026-04-01vs Suntree - RezaWon 21
L#1 DoublesNicole Kendrick / Madeline Calise vs Maria Reza / Wendy Paul3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCourtney McCaleb vs Tracy Thomas6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMargaret Kendrick / Ashley St Vil vs Karina Jimenez / Mary Overton6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.38
Inez Prior
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.37
Courtney McCaleb
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Carri Prior
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.08
Ashley St Vil
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.04
Natalie Happ
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.02
Nicole Kendrick
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
1.98
Margaret Kendrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.88
Madeline Calise
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Kendrick + Ashley St Vil4453% games+13.7% vs expected
Nicole Kendrick + Madeline Calise033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Inez Prior
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Courtney McCaleb
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Carri Prior
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Ashley St Vil
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Natalie Happ
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Nicole Kendrick
6W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Margaret Kendrick
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Madeline Calise
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.