Teams

Escambia/Craft/18&OverCombo/6.5M

2023 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Combo 18 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-30vs Schmidt - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesWill Spencer / James Craft vs Steven Thames / Jim Smith7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesZach Pohlmann / Robert Fabbro vs Nathan Hancock / Tim Ekelund6-3, 6-3
2023-11-16vs O'Neill - PCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesWill Spencer / Chase Dupuis vs Charlie Culpepper / Shamus Prindiville6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Rick Bucco vs Jase Graves / Mike Esmonde7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-11-09vs Anderson - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Fabbro / Zach Pohlmann vs Arturo Ramirez / Ed Souza6-4, 7-5
2023-11-02vs Schmidt - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesWill Spencer / Chase Dupuis vs Tracy Schmidt / Alex Leonard7-5, 6-4
2023-10-26vs O'Neill - PCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesWill Spencer / Chase Dupuis vs Steven Bingert / Mike Esmonde6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesZach Pohlmann / Robert Fabbro vs Eric Rasmussen / Chris Shaffer6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Will Spencer
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.80
Robert Fabbro
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.60
Kirk Bradley
published
3.57
James Richardson
published 4
3.40
James Craft
published 3.5
3.37
Chase Dupuis
published 3.5
3.32
Scott Aspinwall
published
3.27
Craig Abel
published 3.5
3.09
Ryan Worley
published
2.86
Zach Pohlmann
published
2.77
Rick Bucco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Will Spencer + Robert Fabbro231656% games−2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Will Spencer
121W–56L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
Robert Fabbro
143W–78L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Kirk Bradley
3W–19L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
James Richardson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
James Craft
19W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Chase Dupuis
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
Scott Aspinwall
38W–41L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Craig Abel
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Ryan Worley
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.09
Zach Pohlmann
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.86
Rick Bucco
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.