Teams

MLLVE - River Run

2024 Lake 40 & Over Mixed Doubles · Mixed 3.0 Thurs pm 40+

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesJonathan Ridgway / Holly Ridgway vs Marilou Martin / Steve Cada4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesBlake Brescian / Natalie Brescian vs Ann Murphy / John Murphy4-6, 2-6
2024-07-25vs LKGI-Gibson/WestportWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatalie Brescian / Blake Brescian vs Charlie Crowe / Sandra Stinson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHolly Ridgway / Jonathan Ridgway vs Edwin Stinson / Melanie Strauss6-2, 7-5
2024-07-17vs LKGI-Gibson/WestportWon 10
W#2 DoublesJonathan Ridgway / Holly Ridgway vs Charles Duquemin / Stacie Zerfoss6-4, 6-3
2024-07-11vs MLTPO-Powell/Westport_40+3.0 MXWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Brescian / Blake Brescian vs Kristen Rogers / Edward Levy6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesNatalie Brescian / Blake Brescian vs Jason Schoenrock / Marilou Martin5-7, 3-6
2024-06-06vs LKGI-Gibson/WestportWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatalie Brescian / Blake Brescian vs Ted Gibson / KJ Gibson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJonathan Ridgway / Holly Ridgway vs Sandra Stinson / Edwin Stinson6-2, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 3.0 Thurs pm 40+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Jonathan Ridgway
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.04
Natalie Brescian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Lauren Verlander
published
2.78
Mark McGuire
published
Daniel Bogosh
published 3
2.67
Holly Ridgway
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Elise Wehrum
published 3
2.64
Johanna Butow
published
2.62
Ken Bush
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Ridgway + Jonathan Ridgway8657% games−5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jonathan Ridgway
42W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Natalie Brescian
56W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.04
Lauren Verlander
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.85
Mark McGuire
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Bridgette Ashbrook
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Daniel Bogosh
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Holly Ridgway
42W–59L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Elise Wehrum
28W–24L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
Johanna Butow
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
2.64
Ken Bush
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.