Teams

TTA GOLD

2022 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-16vs NJ GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanine Huber / Kristen Womer vs Nina Miranda / Sara Quackenbush5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2022-04-09vs MVCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesNohemi Almaraz / Lisa Shaver vs Tara McEnroe / Nancy Fairchild6-2, 6-3
2022-03-26vs NJ BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Shaver / Janine Huber vs Nora Tucker / Shannon Hempelman6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKristen Womer / Jennifer Nash vs Kristin Walters / Kathleen Gerbino0-6, 3-6
2022-03-19vs BCST BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Womer / Janine Huber vs Kimberley Hoefen / Colleen Callahan6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Nohemi Almaraz
published 3.5
2.87
Janine Huber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Lisa Shaver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Kristen Womer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.20
SONJA STANLEY
published
2.13
Jennifer Nash
published
Linda Bennett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Womer + Nohemi Almaraz5166% games+13.3% vs expected
Lisa Shaver + Kristen Womer121151% games+2.9% vs expected
SONJA STANLEY + Kristen Womer8160% games+1.4% vs expected
Jennifer Nash + SONJA STANLEY81344% games−7.0% vs expected
Lisa Shaver + Janine Huber134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Shaver + Nohemi Almaraz314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Nash + Kristen Womer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nohemi Almaraz
105W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.56
3
Janine Huber
85W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Lisa Shaver
72W–76L career · 2 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Kristen Womer
63W–86L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
SONJA STANLEY
42W–43L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.20
Jennifer Nash
16W–53L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Linda Bennett
6W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.