Teams

KY/LOU/GORDINIER(NPC)/COURTENAY

2023 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.08 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Aubrey Mojesky
published 3.5
2.94
Deanna Gordinier
published 3
2.87
Elizabeth Torp
published
2.84
Betsy Brill
published 3
2.83
Lashae Higdon
published
2.68
Whitney Jamie
published
2.58
JESSICA MOORE
published
2.57
Amy Brennenstuhl
published 3
2.53
Dawn Courtenay
published 3
2.50
Drew Andreoli
published
2.48
Virginia Hafer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Courtenay + Elizabeth Torp2441% games−5.6% vs expected
Whitney Jamie + Elizabeth Torp123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aubrey Mojesky
12W–25L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Deanna Gordinier
24W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Elizabeth Torp
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Betsy Brill
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
Lashae Higdon
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
Whitney Jamie
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
JESSICA MOORE
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Amy Brennenstuhl
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Dawn Courtenay
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
2.53
Drew Andreoli
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Angela Leinenbach
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.48
Virginia Hafer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.