Teams

KPerry (Park Road)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-02Won 20
W#2 SinglesChivonne Hunter vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSmita Merchant / Van ONeill vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-25vs CGoldblatt/STo (OPRC)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesChivonne Hunter vs Sarah Niess3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVan ONeill / MacKenzie Roberts vs Caroline Pickup / Kimberly Valitchka0-6, 2-6
2024-04-23vs SReynolds (Hornets Nest)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesChivonne Hunter vs Christina Thigpen2-6, 0-6
2024-04-18vs WParker/RSchuler (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMargaret Campbell / Chivonne Hunter vs Maggie Connolly / Heather Crysler0-6, 1-6
2024-03-21Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChivonne Hunter vs Lauren Boyles2-6, 2-6
2024-03-14vs NHaskins (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesChivonne Hunter vs Hoa Tran3-6, 3-6
2024-03-07vs WJourdan (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKatie Perry / Van ONeill vs Heather Rhyne / Tamara Gallagher4-6, 1-6
2024-02-29vs CGoldblatt/STo (OPRC)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesChivonne Hunter vs Sandra To5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Natalie Lombardi
published
3.68
Smita Merchant
published
3.53
Lindsay Smith
published
3.49
Chivonne Hunter
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.49
3.44
Kathleen Early
published
3.34
3.33
Sydney Gaston
published
3.06
Mitchell Kelling
published
2.95
Van ONeill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sydney Gaston + Christy Haseltine123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Lombardi
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.83
Smita Merchant
29W–35L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Lindsay Smith
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Chivonne Hunter
34W–36L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
4
Christy Haseltine
5W–23L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
Kathleen Early
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.44
Katherine Koppel-Dobbs
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.34
Sydney Gaston
15W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
Mitchell Kelling
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Van ONeill
18W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.95
Katie van Valkinburgh
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.