Teams

Mission Oaks Scorpions

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-28vs Westlake WACkosSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPunit Rawal / David Dewing vs Justin Hasting / Lucas Chilczuk6-7, 4-6
L#1 Singlesdavid sohn vs MIQUEL FERNANDEZ GOMEZ6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Dawe / Steven Nimoy vs Christian Ruitberg / Eric Weilage6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaushik Chatterjee / John Boniface vs Todd Isroelit / David Farkas6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Punit Rawal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
3.25
Kaushik Chatterjee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
John Boniface
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Sudheendra Prasad
published
3.20
Sridhara Nagaraju
published
3.20
David Dewing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
david sohn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.14
Steve Sylvers
published
3.13
Matthew Dawe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Karthik Prasad
published
2.95
Jay Idea
published
Rodrigo Reis
published
Steven Nimoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sudheendra Prasad + Matthew Dawe123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Punit Rawal
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Ramprasad Gururaja Rao
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Kaushik Chatterjee
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
John Boniface
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Sudheendra Prasad
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Sridhara Nagaraju
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
David Dewing
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
david sohn
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Steve Sylvers
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Matthew Dawe
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Karthik Prasad
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Jay Idea
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
Rodrigo Reis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Nimoy
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.