← Teams

THPRD-Ross-Brockett/Birge

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.94 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
THAO VAN
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.89
Cynthia Ross-Brockett
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Suki Birge
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.80
Barbara Bomar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
—
Cindy Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
—
Yukiko Namba
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.67
Megan Clifford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.46
Rosalie Trevejo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2025-03-16Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesSloane Klonsky / Cynthia Ross-Brockett vs Eunhee Heller / Julie Ahn6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMegan Clifford / Erin Doucet vs Misug Kim / Dawan Pandya6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCindy Bennett / Rosalie Trevejo vs Janet Ha / Jing Bennett6-3, 6-0
2025-03-02Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSuki Birge / Jessica Castillo vs Elizabeth Large / Linda Falvey6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesYukiko Namba vs Joy Heinecke6-4, 5-3
L#2 DoublesErin Doucet / Barbara Bomar vs Amy Adams / Kelly Letourneau4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMiwako Kobayashi / Suki Birge vs Jaime Venezia / Joann Szueber6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJessica Castillo / THAO VAN vs Cyndi Johnson / Tiffany Starkey6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCindy Bennett / Kay Hallmark vs Delena Palena / Alisa Rakoz6-0, 6-3
2025-02-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMiwako Kobayashi / Megan Clifford vs Crystal Ounaphom / Stephanie Titler6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSuki Birge / Yukiko Namba vs Lara Lunsford / Erin Corzine6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTHAO VAN / Cynthia Ross-Brockett vs Eve Krauel / Chelsea McGraw6-1, 6-3
2025-02-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSuki Birge / Miwako Kobayashi vs Susan Sienko / Milenka Coltman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTHAO VAN / Cynthia Ross-Brockett vs Melinda Magaddino / Julie Blodgett6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCindy Bennett / Barbara Bomar vs Lisa Henshaw / Erin Boehm6-2, 6-2
2025-01-24Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesSuki Birge / Miwako Kobayashi vs Lee Gates / Leanne Kong6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBarbara Bomar vs Nancy Pan6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesErin Doucet / Cynthia Ross-Brockett vs Yan Morrissey / Yuxia Ouyang6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCindy Bennett / Rosalie Trevejo vs Susan Putterman / Liz Theeuws6-3, 6-1
2025-01-19Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKay Hallmark / Megan Clifford vs Anne Gaggini / Carrie Thomas6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Ross-Brockett / THAO VAN vs Kathleen Greene / Toni Mikel6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Bomar / Erin Doucet vs Jennifer West / Marcia Hartson6-0, 6-3
2025-01-11Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesYukiko Namba vs Lynn Lotti6-0, 6-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Bennett / THAO VAN vs Heidi Funke / Lindsay Jenkins7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRosalie Trevejo / Megan Clifford vs Annet Lems / Mandee Schroer6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
THAO VAN
62W–28L career
0%51%49%
3.11
3
Cynthia Ross-Brockett
119W–97L career
0%96%4%
2.89
3
Suki Birge
61W–80L career
0%98%1%
2.81
3
Barbara Bomar
5W–9L career
1%96%3%
2.80
3
Cindy Bennett
47W–62L career
not enough data
—
3
Yukiko Namba
27W–29L career
not enough data
—
3
Megan Clifford
65W–60L career
7%93%0%
2.67
2.5
Rosalie Trevejo
28W–41L career
0%48%52%
2.46

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.