Teams

KRC

2026 Tri-One Doubles League · 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-22vs Unforced FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesVincent McCormack / Corey Corrales vs Manuel Luis Montero / Michael Onuma6-3, 6-2
2026-08-08vs Confidence BuildersWon 10
W#1 DoublesTurhan Folse / Corey Corrales vs Christopher Stevens / Christopher Bebensee6-3, 6-1
2026-08-01vs One Halawa Topspin!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesVincent McCormack / Sean Medeiros vs Dillon Young / Wladymeir Bruce Savaille2-6, 2-6
2026-07-25vs Unforced FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesVincent McCormack / Corey Corrales vs Michael Onuma / Gem Lacbay6-0, 6-3
2026-07-18vs Confidence BuildersWon 10
W#1 DoublesTurhan Folse / Sean Medeiros vs Buck Yoon / Christopher Stevens6-1, 6-0
2026-07-12vs One Halawa Topspin!Won 10
W#1 DoublesVincent McCormack / Corey Corrales vs Jared Griffin / Wladymeir Bruce Savaille7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-05vs Unforced FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesEvan Scherman / Corey Corrales vs Radley Balde / Kody Uratsuka6-3, 6-1
2026-06-28vs Confidence BuildersWon 10
W#1 DoublesEvan Scherman / Vincent McCormack vs David Yuen / Christopher Stevens6-2, 6-0
2026-06-21vs One Halawa Topspin!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesVincent McCormack / Sean Medeiros vs Dillon Young / Wladymeir Bruce Savaille3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KRC6262549
2One Halawa Topspin!5353762
3Unforced Fun5353977
4Confidence Builders08081697

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Vincent McCormack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.11
Corey Corrales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Evan Scherman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Sean Medeiros
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Turhan Folse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vincent McCormack + Corey Corrales4551% games−0.5% vs expected
Vincent McCormack + Sean Medeiros4349% games−5.2% vs expected
Corey Corrales + Sean Medeiros2447% gamesnot enough data
Sean Medeiros + Turhan Folse213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Vincent McCormack
69W–47L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.12
3
Corey Corrales
57W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
Evan Scherman
19W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Sean Medeiros
50W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Turhan Folse
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.