Teams

PORT HURON-JOHNSON 70 MEN 65&O AD SEM

2022 SEM ADULT 65 & OVER DAY MEN · 7.0 MEN FRI AM SEM

6 players · average NTRP / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesGlenn Johnson / John Oswell vs James Charron / Rick Scavarda1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Goldfarb / Michael Ziegler vs Gregory Gale / John Johnson0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesDaniel Johnson / Michael Ziegler vs Tino Dibattista / Gregory Gale3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTimothy Lozen / David Goldfarb vs Gary Gorski / Rick Scavarda5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesDavid Goldfarb / Timothy Lozen vs Gary Gorski / Rick Scavarda2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Oswell / Glenn Johnson vs Gregory Gale / James Charron2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesDaniel Johnson / Michael Ziegler vs Jeffrey Blackman / Tino Dibattista2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Goldfarb / Glenn Johnson vs Gary Gorski / Rick Scavarda2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesDaniel Johnson / Michael Ziegler vs Jeffrey Blackman / James Charron2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGlenn Johnson / Timothy Lozen vs Gregory Gale / Gary Gorski2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesDavid Goldfarb / Timothy Lozen vs John Johnson / Tino Dibattista1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Oswell / Gary Schafer vs Gregory Gale / Rick Scavarda2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN FRI AM SEM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Goldfarb
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Gary Schafer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John Oswell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Ziegler
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Timothy Lozen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tom Fodell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Lozen + David Goldfarb033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

David Goldfarb
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Gary Schafer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
John Oswell
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Ziegler
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Timothy Lozen
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Fodell
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.