Teams

Baldwin

2023 Anne Arundel Singles · Anne Arundel Adult Singles 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-28Won 10
W#1 SinglesLeann Gibbs vs Sarah Winn6-0, 6-0
2023-10-26Won 10
W#1 SinglesLeann Gibbs vs Michelle O'Brien6-3, 6-3
2023-10-18Won 10
W#2 SinglesLeann Gibbs vs Nicole Wiseman6-0, 6-0
2023-10-02Lost 01
L#3 SinglesLara Henneman vs Liz Single2-6, 1-6
2023-09-18vs Lady StrikersLost 01
L#2 SinglesLara Henneman vs Regan Lonchena0-4
2023-08-26vs WoffordLost 01
L#1 SinglesLeann Gibbs vs Heather Nesti1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-14vs Lady StrikersLost 01
L#1 SinglesLeann Gibbs vs Courtney Laughlin4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Leann Gibbs
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Meghan Miller
published
3.01
Laura Conroy
published
2.80
Jennifer Timian
published
2.67
Priti Bhansali
published 3
2.30
Lara Henneman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Leann Gibbs
98W–77L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Meghan Miller
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Laura Conroy
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.01
Jennifer Timian
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Priti Bhansali
9W–21L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Lara Henneman
21W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.