Teams

Cheval Aces and Eights - N. Martinez

2024 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 and Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesJorge Angel / Sylvie Roy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-03vs Avila - T. WisselLost 01
L#2 DoublesRandolph Gibson / Sylvie Roy vs Davis Bilardello / Tish Wissel6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-02-25vs HCC Poresuyo - E. VargasSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCraig Arndt / Rebecca Gibson vs Ani Ganesan / Kristin Baker3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPeter Marsocci / Melany Jablonski vs Ray Eckstein / Kristen Wehrman6-3, 6-2
2024-02-11vs Palma Ceia - W. RobertsWon 10
W#2 DoublesCraig Arndt / Sylvie Roy vs Will Roberts / Stacy Hausinger6-2, 6-3
2024-01-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesCraig Arndt / Sylvie Roy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-01-21vs Hills/Helme/40&Over8.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCraig Arndt / Natalie Martinez vs Enrique Escobar / Tania Biller5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFelipe Martinez / Melany Jablonski vs Richard Helme / Elizabeth Burdick2-6, 6-7
2024-01-14vs D.I. Mixed - M. VoelkerWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Marsocci / Melany Jablonski vs Jermaine Flowers / Jennifer Lewis6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Craig Arndt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.87
Melany Jablonski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Felipe Martinez
published
3.73
Peter Marsocci
published
3.73
Natalie Martinez
published
3.62
Diane Jackson
published 4
3.51
Casey Gates
published 4
3.50
Rebecca Gibson
published
3.32
Sylvie Roy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Lisa Durkin
published
Jorge Angel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Martinez + Felipe Martinez224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Craig Arndt
65W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
4
Melany Jablonski
135W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
Felipe Martinez
23W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Peter Marsocci
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Natalie Martinez
26W–23L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Diane Jackson
15W–18L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Casey Gates
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
Rebecca Gibson
25W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Sylvie Roy
161W–139L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Lisa Durkin
18W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Jorge Angel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.