← Teams

CGM-Reed

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
John Hapke
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Augustin Belindean
usually #2 Singles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Jon Peters
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Rolf Ellingsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Hayward Reed
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Kimbal Logan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
David Smiley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results8 ties
2020-02-21Won 2–1
W#2 DoublesJohn Hapke / Kimbal Logan vs Gary Doyle / Bob Towne7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAugustin Belindean vs Wes Schalk6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / Hayward Reed vs Jim Hamlik / Steven Darling6-4, 6-3
2020-02-15Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesJohn Hapke / Stanley Hanks vs Rajan Madhusudan / Kok Waii Wong6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJon Peters / Charles Hahn vs Michael Leake / Yuehai Liang6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAugustin Belindean vs Jeff Legassick6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKimbal Logan / David Smiley vs Peter Brandenburger / Sharad Tripathi6-4, 6-2
2020-02-07Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesHayward Reed / Mark Muckerheide vs Vijay Kesana / Bala Prashanth Reddy Chappidi6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRolf Ellingsen / John Hapke vs Austin Martinez / Adam Rainey6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAugustin Belindean vs Jonathan Howe6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesFransiscus Odaya / Kimbal Logan vs Sebastian Llados Vila / Julian Miller7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2020-02-01Lost 1–2
W#2 DoublesHayward Reed / Mark Muckerheide vs Nick Hooker / Robert Glenn6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAugustin Belindean vs Dan Tracy6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJon Peters / Kimbal Logan vs Darreon Day / Greg Culver7-6, 6-4
2020-01-17Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesStanley Hanks / Rolf Ellingsen vs Brett Warren / Allen VanLeuven5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimbal Logan / Charles Hahn vs Christopher Shaw / Bob Lehman6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAugustin Belindean vs Ben Yamaguchi6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJohn Hapke / David Smiley vs Anthony Guzzi / Rick Davis1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2020-01-05Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesStanley Hanks / John Hapke vs Shane Kim / Robert Kelly6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAugustin Belindean vs Thomas Huff7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCharles Hahn / Rolf Ellingsen vs Michael Lee / Alejandro Kitzis6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMark Muckerheide / David Smiley vs Kent Wall / Charlie Adams6-4, 6-4
2019-12-08Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesLoren Davis / Jon Peters vs Gary Townsend / Craig Mills4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2019-12-07Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesCharles Hahn / Kimbal Logan vs Clark Cosart / Dan Wendling6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlex Mazzia / Jon Peters vs Randy Nicholson / Scott Mayer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
John Hapke
81W–77L career
0%97%2%
3.32
3.5
Augustin Belindean
28W–23L career · type S
not enough data
—
3.5
Jon Peters
33W–36L career · type M
8%87%5%
3.25
3.5
Rolf Ellingsen
43W–38L career
not enough data
—
3
Hayward Reed
34W–32L career
not enough data
—
3
Kimbal Logan
39W–57L career
not enough data
—
0
David Smiley
19W–35L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.