Teams

GOLDMAN TC CM8.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 8.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-22vs GOLDMAN TC CM8.5CWon 30
W#1 DoublesCody Lin / Sharan Shodhan vs ANDREY VOLYNETS / Brandon Han6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndrew Wu / David Reel vs Kurt Tsuo / Nathaniel Green7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDalton Lobo Dias / Kyle Zhu vs Peter Su / Benjamin Bach6-4, 6-0
2025-10-12vs GOLDMAN TC CM8.5DWon 30
W#1 DoublesZun Zhou / Kyle Zhu vs Samuel Han / Daniel Dang6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Reel / Keenaj Mahendra Mevada vs Alec Tang / Bryan Tom6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaniel Chen / Dalton Lobo Dias vs Jordan Brewer / Wesley Loo6-0, 7-5
2025-09-07vs GOLDMAN TC CM8.5CWon 21
W#1 DoublesKeenaj Mahendra Mevada / Zun Zhou vs Pranav Krishnan / Connor Harrison6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDaniel Chen / Yu Ning Yu vs Benjamin Bach / Kevin Wang6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCody Lin / Eli Lin vs ANDREY VOLYNETS / Sam Ko6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Keenaj Mahendra Mevada
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.36
Nate Houghteling
published
4.31
Sharan Shodhan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.25
Cody Lin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Yu Ning Yu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Kyle Zhu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.99
Andrew Sturges
published 4.5
3.99
Eli Lin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Zun Zhou
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Bryan Kurtz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Vincent Mar
published
3.75
David Reel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Michael Gross
published
3.70
Dalton Lobo Dias
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keenaj Mahendra Mevada
14W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
4.40
Nate Houghteling
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
4.36
Sharan Shodhan
18W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
4.31
4.5
Cody Lin
20W–0L career · type D · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
Yu Ning Yu
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
Kyle Zhu
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Andrew Sturges
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
Eli Lin
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Zun Zhou
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Bryan Kurtz
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Vincent Mar
28W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
David Reel
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Michael Gross
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.71
3.5
Dalton Lobo Dias
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.