Teams

Luong/Rogers/SRC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-17Split 11
L#2 DoublesBrooke Redfern / Katie Read vs Alex Davis / Anna Scott Chesshir6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMimi Luong / Elizabeth Scott vs Susan Murray / Leeanna Rogers6-4, 6-4
2024-12-19vs Schley-Chrenka/Springdale/MRCWon 21
W#1 SinglesBrooke Redfern vs Jeannine Wheeler6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJamia Weir vs Laurel Schley2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMaria Rene Arandia Jimenez vs Rachel Meredith6-1, 6-2
2024-12-17vs Stewart/Fayetteville/FACWon 30
W#1 SinglesBrooke Redfern vs Kelly Calvert Stewart6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMimi Luong vs Michele Senlikci6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesHaley Maxwell vs Sherry Lux6-1, 6-1
2024-11-19vs Van Schenck/Garfield/KTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesMaria Rene Arandia Jimenez vs Kelsey Sundara7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJamia Weir vs Courtney Kleinebreil7-6, 6-3
W#3 SinglesHaley Maxwell vs Meera Narayan6-2, 6-2
2024-11-19vs Stewart/Fayetteville/FACWon 30
W#1 SinglesMimi Luong vs Sarah White6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBrooke Redfern vs Michele Senlikci6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesEmma Savoy vs Carolina Gomez6-2, 6-2
2024-11-18vs Daglow-Anderson/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesEmma Savoy vs Piper Anderson3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesNatalie Herold vs Laurie Letts5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJamia Weir vs Shangwen Huang7-6, 6-4
2024-10-29vs Tarnasky/Fayetteville/FACLost 12
W#1 SinglesEmma Savoy vs Jennifer Tarnasky7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMaria Rene Arandia Jimenez vs Anne Thomas Madsen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesNatalie Herold vs Sarah Bright4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Brooke Redfern
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
Mimi Luong
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Jamia Weir
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.35
Emma Savoy
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.28
Haley Maxwell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Maria Rene Arandia Jimenez
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Natalie Herold
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Haley Maxwell + Emma Savoy314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brooke Redfern
11W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
Mimi Luong
22W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Jamia Weir
36W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Emma Savoy
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.35
Haley Maxwell
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Maria Rene Arandia Jimenez
5W–4L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Natalie Herold
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.