Teams

*1-MHansen-HVCC

2024 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-05-02vs *3-ATiemann-UNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinsey Hughes / Catherine Jefferson vs Amy Hoots / Kelly Johnson6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlana Argersinger / Kristen Ingle vs Elaine Yeh / Cheryl Stevens4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMarie Hansen / Melanie Biese vs Ellen Reich / Patty Hubbard5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-24vs *5-KHoekstra-HR-40Split 11
W#1 DoublesCatherine Jefferson / Linsey Hughes vs Carrie Norry / Lindsay Stanek6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKristen Ingle / Kelly Moore vs Jennifer Gillie / Cynthia Sundy2-6, 4-6
2024-04-18vs *4-JOgle-CCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarie Hansen / Catherine Jefferson vs Jennifer Ogle / Gay Engelbrecht6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelanie Biese / Kristen Ingle vs Anna Fadel / Mercer Griffin3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-04-04vs *6-SSummers-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinsey Hughes / Catherine Jefferson vs Michele Freiburghouse / Frances Henderson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMelanie Biese / Kristen Ingle vs Araya Coffey / Joelle Permutt7-5, 6-3
2024-03-28vs *2-Hagerty-YMCA-40Won 30
W#1 SinglesCatherine Jefferson vs Kellianne White6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMelanie Biese / Linsey Hughes vs Christine Chnupa / Sally Mauriello6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Everett / Marie Hansen vs Elaine Bardes / Karen Heinemann7-5, 6-2
2024-03-21vs *3-ATiemann-UNCWon 21
L#1 SinglesCatherine Jefferson vs Amy Hoots3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLinsey Hughes / Kristen Ingle vs Ellen Reich / Elaine Yeh6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMelanie Biese / Marie Hansen vs Patty Hubbard / Vivian Muzyk6-3, 7-6
2024-03-18vs *5-KHoekstra-HR-40Won 21
W#1 DoublesAlana Argersinger / Catherine Jefferson vs Mary Fortin / Leona Buckley4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarie Hansen / Nancy Pike vs Jennifer Gillie / Kateri Hoekstra6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKristen Ingle / Aimee Poduri vs Deborah Garbee / Jaime Parker2-6, 4-6
2024-03-14vs *4-JOgle-CCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Ingle / Melanie Biese vs Tammy Chin / Barbara Schwartz6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Jennifer Ogle3-6, 4-6
2024-02-29vs *6-SSummers-CHTCWon 20
W#2 DoublesMelanie Biese / Catherine Jefferson vs Heidi Blankenship / Katharine Walton6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristen Ingle / Nancy Pike vs Araya Coffey / Michele Freiburghouse6-3, 6-1
2024-02-22vs *2-Hagerty-YMCA-40Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarie Hansen / Catherine Jefferson vs Denise Heinze / DJ Maniace5-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Linsey Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Amy Herman
published 3.5
3.40
Alana Argersinger
published 3.5
3.40
Catherine Jefferson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.22
Kristen Ingle
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Marie Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Melanie Biese
published
3.09
Nancy Pike
published
3.06
Aimee Poduri
published 3.5
3.05
Cecily Peterson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.66
Elizabeth Everett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linsey Hughes + Catherine Jefferson9062% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Biese + Kristen Ingle134 matchesnot enough data
Marie Hansen + Nancy Pike213 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Jefferson + Kristen Ingle033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Linsey Hughes
87W–47L career · 8 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Amy Herman
22W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.60
3.5
Alana Argersinger
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Catherine Jefferson
100W–37L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Kristen Ingle
60W–43L career · 8 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Marie Hansen
56W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Melanie Biese
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Nancy Pike
9W–16L career · no lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Aimee Poduri
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
34%65%<1%
3.06
3
Cecily Peterson
207W–207L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
Elizabeth Everett
8W–20L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.