Teams

Men's Quads

2026 NOGTA Summer Quads · Quads

16 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Quads
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Men's Quads000000
2Women's Quads000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alan Buttenhoff
published 4
3.63
Gary Quast
published 4
3.55
Jack Sismour
published 4
3.29
Ashwin Venkatesu
published 3.5
3.22
Johnny Kendrick
published
3.20
Phil Johnson
published
3.15
James Stanfield
published 3.5
3.04
Scott King
published
3.04
Gene King
published 3.5
2.89
Kyle Gonzalez-lloyd
published
2.87
Richard Morrison
published
Hector Chiessa
published 2.5
Dean Puryear
published
Manuel Guzman
published
Ricardo Pedrotti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phil Johnson + Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gireeshkumar Gopinathakaimal
9W–23L career · type M · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Alan Buttenhoff
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Gary Quast
3W–24L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Jack Sismour
12W–24L career · type D · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Ashwin Venkatesu
19W–20L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
Johnny Kendrick
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.22
Phil Johnson
3W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.20
3.5
James Stanfield
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
Scott King
39W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.04
3.5
Gene King
4W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kyle Gonzalez-lloyd
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Richard Morrison
18W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
2.5
Hector Chiessa
3W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Dean Puryear
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Manuel Guzman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ricardo Pedrotti
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.