Teams

Shank

2026 Lubbock Adult League 40 & Over · 3.5 Mens

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-09vs SpearsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Chad Carter / Rusty Shaw vs Patrick McLaurin / David Rowell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRobert Craig vs Hector Martin Palacio6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCorey Shank / Marty Cleckler vs Teofilo Bancaso / Hung Tran6-7, 1-6
2026-03-05vs SpearsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJohn Chad Carter / Marty Cleckler vs Patrick McLaurin / David Rowell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVinicius MacHado vs Teofilo Bancaso1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEugenio Aulisa / Rusty Shaw vs Stanley Brewer / Kirk Spears7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Ballou / Cody White vs Jeasik Cho / Hung Tran1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-02vs PerrinLost 13
L#1 DoublesRobert Craig / Rusty Shaw vs David Kerby / Jamie Rendon0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesVinicius MacHado vs Bharat Kakarala0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Chad Carter / Marty Cleckler vs Matt Byars / Jerry Jerabek6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCody White / Michael Ballou vs JB Henderson / James Perrin6-3, 6-4
2026-02-23vs PerrinLost 13
L#1 DoublesRobert Craig / Rusty Shaw vs David Kerby / Jamie Rendon3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVinicius MacHado vs Kerry Thompson4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEugenio Aulisa / John Chad Carter vs Matt Byars / Timothy Byars6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMarty Cleckler / Cody White vs JB Henderson / Jerry Jerabek6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-02-16vs SpearsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJohn Chad Carter / Rusty Shaw vs Hung Tran / Teofilo Bancaso6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesVinicius MacHado vs Patrick McLaurin6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMarty Cleckler / Robert Craig vs Stanley Brewer / Simon Williams1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCorey Shank / Cody White vs David Rowell / Kirk Spears3-6, 6-7
2026-02-09vs PerrinLost 12
L#1 DoublesRusty Shaw / Robert Craig vs David Kerby / Jamie Rendon1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Chad Carter / Vinicius MacHado vs Matt Byars / Timothy Byars6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMarty Cleckler / Keith Mann vs Bharat Kakarala / Kerry Thompson4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Mens
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Shank33101430212
2Spears1481227193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Vinicius MacHado
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.44
John Chad Carter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Rusty Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.30
Eugenio Aulisa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Corey Shank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Keith Mann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Marty Cleckler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Robert Craig
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.16
Michael Ballou
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cody White
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rusty Shaw + John Chad Carter4255% games+3.1% vs expected
Robert Craig + Rusty Shaw044 matchesnot enough data
Eugenio Aulisa + John Chad Carter314 matchesnot enough data
Robert Craig + John Chad Carter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vinicius MacHado
26W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
John Chad Carter
36W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Rusty Shaw
12W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Eugenio Aulisa
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Corey Shank
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Keith Mann
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Marty Cleckler
9W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Robert Craig
12W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Michael Ballou
21W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Cody White
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.