Teams

BCC TEAL

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

16 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-08vs MEA NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeslie Herz / Regan Ebert vs Tricia Yeo / Thanyanat LeBlang4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnnah Worland / Jung Lindas vs Tanya Goble / Jahnavi Brenner3-6, 4-6
2025-07-01vs BRMST REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesWendi Hill / Katherine Beeck vs Stacey Mari / Michelle Schulz5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRegan Ebert / Stephanie Short vs Melissa Clarke / Laura Tedesco1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-24vs MEA GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Caruso / Victoria McCarthy vs Valerie Walsh / Lydia Moy6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLeslie Herz / Stephanie Short vs Aileen Bryan / Katherine Croasdale1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJackie Kramer / Annah Worland vs Emel Gomulka / Aimee Miller6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-17vs CVTA TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendi Hill / JILLIAN HOLMSTROM vs Lindsey Cheney / Jacy Bowers6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathy Caruso / Michelle Gallop vs Dionne Jimenez / Lauren Annino6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnnah Worland / Jackie Kramer vs Sara Fedorka / Tracey Graham7-5, 7-5
2025-06-15vs NJ REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachael Sparks / Diana Liu vs Kimberly Bonczynski / Megan Shibao4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKatherine Beeck vs Michelle Halliday1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJILLIAN HOLMSTROM / Julia McNeal vs Lauren Rivas / Terming Chew6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs LTA-Q ORANGELost 12
L#1 DoublesWendi Hill / Rachael Sparks vs Kelly Mcreynolds / Elizabeth Korniczky6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesKatherine Beeck vs Gretchen Blair1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRegan Ebert / Leslie Herz vs Paula Nelsen / Lydia Wuensch6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
JILLIAN HOLMSTROM
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.90
Wendi Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Rachael Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Victoria McCarthy
published
3.71
Regan Ebert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Leslie Herz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Kathy Caruso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Jung Lindas
published
3.62
Brooke Harrison
published 4
3.60
Stephanie Short
published
3.54
Diana Liu
published 4
3.54
Julia McNeal
published
3.42
Katherine Beeck
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Annah Worland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jackie Kramer
published
Michelle Gallop
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JILLIAN HOLMSTROM + Wendi Hill7456% games+6.0% vs expected
Leslie Herz + Regan Ebert2444% games−4.9% vs expected
Leslie Herz + Katherine Beeck2544% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Caruso + JILLIAN HOLMSTROM4163% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Caruso + Katherine Beeck224 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Beeck + Jung Lindas044 matchesnot enough data
Rachael Sparks + Wendi Hill134 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Caruso + Wendi Hill213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
JILLIAN HOLMSTROM
33W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Wendi Hill
52W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Rachael Sparks
30W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Victoria McCarthy
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Regan Ebert
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Leslie Herz
25W–47L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Kathy Caruso
45W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Jung Lindas
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Brooke Harrison
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Stephanie Short
28W–16L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Diana Liu
1W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
Julia McNeal
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Katherine Beeck
46W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Annah Worland
55W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Jackie Kramer
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Gallop
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.