Teams

CM YELLOW

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-18vs CP YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Heerdt / Amy Newman vs Sanjana Chintalapudi / Janice Jensen3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKai Peters vs Jenna Bambei6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Puschaver / Shannon Burke vs Theress Pidick / Amy Day5-7, 5-7
2026-08-11vs CACM BLACKLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Mcgowan / Andrea Puschaver vs Kara Boulanger / Jess Hadala2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKai Peters vs Kit Demko6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShannon Burke / Mary Vivo vs Rachel Nutt / Sara Vanek2-6, 1-6
2026-08-04vs GPTC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesShannon Burke / Stephanie Mcgowan vs Hilaria Davis / Molly Shinners2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKathleen Heerdt vs Kaye Johnson2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Newman / Mary Vivo vs Katherine Barston / Cristina Cook6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-07-28vs DTC YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesShannon Burke / Stephanie Mcgowan vs Jenna Harris / Kimberly Gillock0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Newman vs Carrie Weingart4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Vivo / Andrea Puschaver vs Kerry Watts / Sharol Preisser6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-21vs CP BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Newman / Mindy Franks vs Sara Hall / Amy Meadows7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKai Peters vs Claire Collins1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Mcgowan / Mary Vivo vs Anna Gallagher / Tia Wolkov5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Kai Peters
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.79
Amy Newman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Mindy Franks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Andrea Puschaver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Krista Speicher
published 4
3.64
Kathleen Heerdt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Shannon Burke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Mary Vivo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Stephanie Mcgowan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Mcgowan + Andrea Puschaver61442% games−1.4% vs expected
Mindy Franks + Amy Newman6651% games−4.6% vs expected
Shannon Burke + Mindy Franks3247% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Burke + Stephanie Mcgowan123 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Burke + Andrea Puschaver123 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Burke + Amy Newman213 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Burke + Mary Vivo213 matchesnot enough data
Mindy Franks + Mary Vivo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kai Peters
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Amy Newman
16W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Mindy Franks
72W–87L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Andrea Puschaver
94W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Krista Speicher
21W–17L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Kathleen Heerdt
37W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.64
Shannon Burke
12W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Mary Vivo
65W–62L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Stephanie Mcgowan
10W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.