Teams

A18 3.0M PW Keller

2024 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Spring · NEOTA A18&O 3.0 Men Spring

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-28vs A18 3.0M MM2 KazazicWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Keller / Doug Michelsen vs Kapil Krishnakumar / Santos Suarez6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKevin Dieterich vs Tyler Stewart6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBob Nicolay / David Fechter vs Eric Levine / Adnan Kazazic7-6, 6-4
2024-04-14vs A18 3.0M WE RizzoLost 12
W#1 DoublesBob Nicolay / John Keller vs Kiyotaka Fukamachi / David Shisila6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJohn Schuld vs Thomas Shaw1-5
L#2 DoublesSrinivas Merugu / Mark Miller vs Michael Henry / Michael Deyo2-6, 4-6
2024-04-07vs A18 3.0M MV BeebeWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Keller / Ryan Kowalski vs Kern Jolibois / Jino Park6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJohn Schuld vs Jeeho Chang6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBob Nicolay / David Fechter vs John Hernandez / Mike Kanetsky6-4, 6-4
2024-03-24vs A18 3.0M MM1 DevarakondaWon 21
L#1 DoublesDoug Michelsen / David Fechter vs Kishore Devarakonda / Ram Medapati2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKevin Dieterich vs Sayyad Bajee Sheik6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBob Nicolay / Ken Luke vs Sumit Patil / Ashutosh Chaudhary6-1, 6-3
2024-03-17vs A18 3.0M CC LombardoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Schuld / Mark Miller vs Michael Mella / Shawn Sun6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDoug Michelsen / Tim Austin vs Cameren Hicks / Henry Palattella6-1, 6-0
2024-03-10vs A18 3.0M MM2 KazazicWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Fechter / Doug Michelsen vs Santos Suarez / Ben Zagorski6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKevin Dieterich vs Tyler Stewart6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTim Austin / Ryan Kowalski vs Adnan Kazazic / James Wang6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-02-25vs A18 3.0M MV BeebeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKevin Dieterich / Doug Michelsen vs Trip Herbruck / Ravi Krishnan6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJohn Schuld vs Ryan White1-6, 2-6
2024-02-11vs A18 3.0M MM1 DevarakondaWon 21
W#1 DoublesBob Nicolay / Ken Luke vs Vamsi Gurugubelli / Sayyad Bajee Sheik7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJohn Schuld vs Jinho Lee4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Miller / David Fechter vs Kishore Devarakonda / Paritosh Juyal3-6, 4-6
2024-02-04vs A18 3.0M CC LombardoWon 30
W#1 DoublesKen Luke / Bob Nicolay vs Matthew Brown / Joe Bocanegra6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKevin Dieterich vs Henry Palattella6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Schuld / Tim Austin vs David Lombardo / Marko Savic6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · NEOTA A18&O 3.0 Men Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 3.0M TP Licari10022820202
2A18 3.0M PW Keller9124620211
3A18 3.0M LT Eng73201026240
4A18 3.0M MM2 Kazazic73181228253
5A18 3.0M MM1 Devarakonda64181227237
6A18 3.0M WR Ciborek64171330249
7A18 3.0M MV Beebe46131736266
8A18 3.0M WE Rizzo37121840297
9A18 3.0M NC Kabbara37121842288
10A18 3.0M GR Ludrosky2892144304
11A18 3.0M PM Towne28102045299
12A18 3.0M CC Lombardo1942654331

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Doug Michelsen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Bob Nicolay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Kevin Dieterich
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Ken Luke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
David Fechter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.73
Ryan Kowalski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
John Keller
published
John Schuld
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Srinivas Merugu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bob Nicolay + Ken Luke11754% games+6.3% vs expected
David Fechter + Kevin Dieterich4155% games+3.2% vs expected
Doug Michelsen + Kevin Dieterich4261% gamesnot enough data
Bob Nicolay + Doug Michelsen2352% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Kowalski + Doug Michelsen404 matchesnot enough data
David Fechter + Doug Michelsen134 matchesnot enough data
Bob Nicolay + John Schuld303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Doug Michelsen
83W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Bob Nicolay
31W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kevin Dieterich
36W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.09
Ken Luke
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
David Fechter
22W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Kowalski
29W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
John Keller
15W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Schuld
14W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Srinivas Merugu
13W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.