Teams

LCAP-Aprile/RR

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 7.5 Women 40s

15 players · average NTRP 3.81 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 18 9:30 AM
vs N/A
Cindy AprileMeredith Ortiz
Sep 25 11:00 AM
River Run Country Club
Oct 2 9:30 AM
Jetton Park
Oct 9 11:00 AM
River Run Country Club
2026-09-11vs LLRU-Russell-Smith/LNRSCWon 21
L#1 DoublesKimberly Robbins / Janet Scott vs Kari Comadoll / Karie Lehigh2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Kerns / Karen Edge vs Leah Russell / Abbi Troutman6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJann Debord / Kimberly Haigney vs Melissa Smith / Tracey McKenna6-3, 6-3
2026-09-04vs LNCH-Cheatham/PACLost 12
W#1 DoublesPamela Zamora / Kimberly Robbins vs Elizabeth Krogstie / Trish Behnke7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Kerns / Terri Utz vs Charlene Whichel / Jan Wildman4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFran Hazell / Britney Bove vs Tanya McMaster / Norma Cheatham6-7, 2-6
2026-08-28vs LWKI-King/CSDWon 21
L#1 DoublesMeredith Ortiz / Ana Endsjo vs Jana Ritter / Kristy Del Monte1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesStephanie Nixdorf / Michelle Bowe vs Tonya Watson / Tanner Jordan6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKimberly Haigney / Terri Utz vs Kristen Rogers / Christina Mullen6-4, 6-3
2026-08-21vs LSCL-Clancy/CRPLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanet Szilagyi / Janet Scott vs Margaret Vermillion / Stephanie Clancy6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Nixdorf / Jann Debord vs Patty Druzbik / Carolyn Peacock3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAna Endsjo / Britney Bove vs Karen Allison / Cindy Peterson6-3, 6-3
2026-08-14vs LSCA-Cantey-Podesta/PeninsulaLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanet Szilagyi / Pamela Zamora vs Kira Skill / Antoinette Jones6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimberly Haigney / Meredith Ortiz vs Alison Siebold / Kim Kelly Senff5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesFran Hazell / Janet Scott vs Lisa Moyer / Alicia Bowman5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 7.5 Women 40s
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LSCL-Clancy/CRP2042544
2LJJO-Joiner/NMP2051548
3LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 +2042551
4LKLR-Riccardelli/Westport1021317
5LWKI-King/CSD1142444
6LJHI-Higgins/Bailey1142761
7LLRU-Russell-Smith/LNRSC1133861
8LMKPO-Portaro/Jetton1133859
9LSCA-Cantey-Podesta/Peninsula1124861
10LAMC-McRorie-Dudan/Jetton0112427
11LNKA-Kayton-Robinson/CSD SPARTAN 7.50112435
12LNCH-Cheatham/PAC0103638
13LCAP-Aprile/RR0224966
14LJRO-Rode/Skybrook02151165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Janet Szilagyi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Kimberly Haigney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Sharon Kerns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Cindy Aprile
published 4
3.58
Ana Endsjo
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
Pamela Zamora
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Fran Hazell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Stephanie Nixdorf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Jann Debord
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Britney Bove
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Michelle Bowe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Janet Scott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Meredith Ortiz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Karen Edge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Terri Utz
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Aprile + Kimberly Haigney3258% games−2.9% vs expected
Terri Utz + Meredith Ortiz10255% gamesnot enough data
Ana Endsjo + Kimberly Haigney3348% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Aprile + Janet Szilagyi314 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Zamora + Cindy Aprile123 matchesnot enough data
Ana Endsjo + Terri Utz123 matchesnot enough data
Fran Hazell + Meredith Ortiz213 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Haigney + Janet Szilagyi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Janet Szilagyi
196W–83L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Kimberly Haigney
49W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Sharon Kerns
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Cindy Aprile
41W–39L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Ana Endsjo
112W–98L career · 5 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Pamela Zamora
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.56
4
Fran Hazell
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
Stephanie Nixdorf
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Jann Debord
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Britney Bove
48W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Michelle Bowe
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Janet Scott
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
Meredith Ortiz
123W–106L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
Karen Edge
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Terri Utz
105W–92L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.