Teams

Melissa Cox

2025 Springfield Adult Mixed 40 & Over League · 6.0 Adult Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-28vs Lori HuntSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAshlei Woelk / Nick Hansen vs Linda Putman / Greg Pearman7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Goldstein / Shawn Rhodes vs Lori Hunt / Tony Roldan6-3, 6-3
2025-07-21vs Lori HuntWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Goldstein / Shawn Rhodes vs Susan Mayr / Greg White6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNick Hansen / Ashlei Woelk vs Tijuana Julian / Jeff Marlin6-3, 7-5
2025-07-14vs Lori HuntLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Cox / Shawn Rhodes vs Jeff Marlin / Linda Putman2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Hayes / Carol Goldstein vs Kenya Pearman / Greg Pearman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNick Hansen / Ashlei Woelk vs Susan Mayr / Greg White6-4, 6-3
2025-07-07vs Lori HuntWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Liljenquist / Melissa Cox vs Tony Roldan / Lori Hunt6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarol Goldstein / Shawn Rhodes vs Jeff Marlin / Tijuana Julian6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNick Hansen / Ashlei Woelk vs Kenya Pearman / Greg Pearman6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Adult Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Melissa Cox2284894
2Lori Hunt224818125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Carol Goldstein
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Ashlei Woelk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Brian Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kevin Liljenquist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Cox
published
Nick Hansen
published
Shawn Rhodes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Cox + Nick Hansen134 matchesnot enough data
Carol Goldstein + Shawn Rhodes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carol Goldstein
35W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Ashlei Woelk
21W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brian Hayes
6W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Liljenquist
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Cox
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Hansen
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Rhodes
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.