Teams

KSWC/Wanless/Pomeroy/65&Over7.0M

2024 KS 65 & Over Adult League · 7.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-01vs KS/Bauersfeld/65&Over7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesScott Bagwell / Andrew Valdivia vs Timothy McManus / Mark Nordstrom4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Rishmany / Berry Wanless vs Jim Bauersfeld / James Pigg3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRoger Bailey / Skip Johnson vs Richard Strange / Ray Wynant3-6, 6-7
2024-06-01vs KS/Bauersfeld/65&Over7.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesSkip Johnson / Duane Pomeroy vs Michael Clutter / Bob Warkentine7-5, 1-2
W#2 DoublesBerry Wanless / Scott Bagwell vs Mark Nordstrom / Timothy McManus5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChris Demas / Roger Bailey vs James Pigg / Ray Wynant2-6, 1-6
2024-05-18vs KS/Bauersfeld/65&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesBerry Wanless / Ronald Dreher vs Kenneth Blair / Craig Yorke5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Valdivia / Gilbert Mahaney vs David Ackerman / Jim Bauersfeld4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDuane Pomeroy / Chris Demas vs Timothy McManus / James Pigg0-6, 0-6
2024-05-18vs KS/Bauersfeld/65&Over7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesTimothy Woods / Berry Wanless vs Bob Warkentine / Michael Clutter2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGilbert Mahaney / Andrew Valdivia vs Timothy McManus / Robert Stacks7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDuane Pomeroy / Chris Demas vs David Ackerman / Mark Nordstrom5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-11vs KS/Bauersfeld/65&Over7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesSkip Johnson / Jim Hawkins vs Jim Bauersfeld / Timothy McManus4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTimothy Woods / Berry Wanless vs Gary Shipp / Craig Yorke4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMark Orozco / Chris Demas vs James Pigg / Richard Strange1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-11vs KS/Bauersfeld/65&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesTimothy Woods / Chris Demas vs Mark Nordstrom / James Pigg2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJim Hawkins / Skip Johnson vs David Ackerman / Ray Wynant3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Valdivia / Joseph Rishmany vs Kenneth Blair / Michael Clutter4-6, 4-6
2024-05-04vs KS/Bauersfeld/65&Over7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesRonald Dreher / Berry Wanless vs Timothy McManus / James Pigg7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRoger Bailey / Duane Pomeroy vs Kenneth Blair / Michael Clutter2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJim Hawkins / Skip Johnson vs Jim Bauersfeld / Richard Strange7-5, 7-5
2024-05-04vs KS/Bauersfeld/65&Over7.0MWon 21
L#1 DoublesSkip Johnson / Jim Hawkins vs Gary Shipp / Craig Yorke2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDuane Pomeroy / Roger Bailey vs Timothy McManus / James Pigg6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRonald Dreher / Andrew Valdivia vs Robert Stacks / Mark Nordstrom6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Scott Bagwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Ronald Dreher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Chris Demas
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.94
Jim Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Timothy Woods
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Andrew Valdivia
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Berry Wanless
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Duane Pomeroy
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Gilbert Mahaney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Rishmany
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Orozco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rodney Bleich
published
Skip Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Skip Johnson + Jim Hawkins134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Orozco + Duane Pomeroy123 matchesnot enough data
Chris Demas + Duane Pomeroy123 matchesnot enough data
Berry Wanless + Duane Pomeroy123 matchesnot enough data
Duane Pomeroy + Rodney Bleich303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Bagwell
50W–97L career · 6 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
Ronald Dreher
12W–9L career · 6 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Chris Demas
23W–17L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jim Hawkins
31W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
Timothy Woods
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.92
3
Andrew Valdivia
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Berry Wanless
19W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Duane Pomeroy
17W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gilbert Mahaney
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joseph Rishmany
43W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Orozco
19W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Rodney Bleich
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Skip Johnson
5W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.