Teams

MS/Stegall

2023 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-29vs LA/Boyd/Louisiana's AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Farris / John Townsend vs Danny Roemer / James Phillips6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClyde Bowie / Thomas Cribbs vs Jay Boyd / Robert Lettow0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Mosal / Earl Stegall vs Parry Thomas / Rick Holland3-6, 1-6
2023-04-28vs TN/Howell/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Mosal / David Farris vs Steven Howell / B McMurtry1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClyde Bowie / John Townsend vs Ed Dismuke / David Sorsby4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEarl Stegall / Thomas Cribbs vs Mike Gross / Joe Buchwald1-6, 2-6
2023-04-28vs OK/Langwell/All TennisLost 12
L#1 DoublesEarl Stegall / Thomas Cribbs vs Thomas Lydy / Steve Amburn2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Mosal / David Farris vs Mike Sarsycki / Gary Bryant2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesClyde Bowie / John Townsend vs Ed Stanley / John Wimbish6-2, 6-4
2023-04-27vs AL/ReasnerLost 12
L#1 DoublesClyde Bowie / John Townsend vs Geoffrey Haynes / Larry Sewell1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEarl Stegall / Thomas Cribbs vs Dennis Reasner / Fred Burkert2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Mosal / David Farris vs Travis Hulsey / Mickey Tidmore6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Farris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Clyde Bowie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
David Mosal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Earl Stegall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
John Townsend
published
Thomas Cribbs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Farris + David Mosal213 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Cribbs + Earl Stegall033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Farris
9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Clyde Bowie
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
David Mosal
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Earl Stegall
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Townsend
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Cribbs
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.