Teams

Team Bellone

2023 Coppermine Adult 18 & Over · Coppermine Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-08vs Team AndrewsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Ford / Maneesha Ahluwalia vs Erin Kim / Sanghee Lee7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-03-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesManeesha Ahluwalia vs Felice Stoller1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-02-15vs Team AndrewsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAshling Pollard / Maneesha Ahluwalia vs Felice Stoller / Elise Morris7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPatricia Mutascio / Heather Burnside vs Sarah Andrews / Jennifer Exelby3-6, 3-6
2023-02-08vs Team AndrewsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Snavely / Kimberly Ford vs Erin Kim / Sanghee Lee2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKelly Bellone / Patricia Mutascio vs Felice Stoller / Jennifer Exelby6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-02-01vs Team AndrewsWon 10
W#1 SinglesManeesha Ahluwalia vs Elena Holford3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-25vs Team AndrewsWon 10
W#1 SinglesManeesha Ahluwalia vs Laura Bull7-6, 5-5
2023-01-18vs Team AndrewsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Bellone / Patricia Mutascio vs Erin Kim / Na Yi6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-01-11vs Team AndrewsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Snavely / Mina Horn vs Sanghee Lee / Erin Kim0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Maneesha Ahluwalia
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Kimberly Ford
published
3.41
Dorie Polakoff
published
3.34
Patricia Mutascio
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Tracy Flaherty
published
3.15
Julie Snavely
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Kelly Bellone
published
3.10
Ashling Pollard
published 3.5
2.87
Joy Kirk
published
Heather Burnside
published
Nicole Conkling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Snavely + Patricia Mutascio41047% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Maneesha Ahluwalia
120W–123L career · 5 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Kimberly Ford
55W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
Dorie Polakoff
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Patricia Mutascio
16W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Tracy Flaherty
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Julie Snavely
35W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Kelly Bellone
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Ashling Pollard
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
Joy Kirk
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.87
Heather Burnside
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Conkling
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.