Teams

LRC-Wilson

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Ken Enslow
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
John Curry
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-03-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesKen Enslow / John Curry vs Michael Harn / Preston Wallace6-1, 6-2
2023-03-05Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRandahl Wilson / Ken Enslow vs Kenneth Kidder / Frank Lee6-4, 6-3
2023-02-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesKen Enslow / John Curry vs Preston Wallace / David Earl6-3, 6-3
2023-02-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Curry / Ken Enslow vs Robert Peters / Justin Ruiz6-4, 6-2
2023-02-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Curry / Ken Enslow vs Charles Taylor / Brody Kunz6-2, 7-5
2023-01-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Curry / Chris Coovert vs Craig Fulkerson / Joseph Bella6-1, 6-0
2023-01-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesJack Hawkins / John Curry vs Lupe Gonzales / Scott Fitzsimmons6-3, 6-2
2023-01-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesKen Enslow / John Curry vs Greg Gormley / Jingzhu Guo6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Ken Enslow
98W–96L career
0%80%20%
3.01
3
John Curry
95W–52L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.