Teams

Veltri - Chen/Torres

2022 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Fall Day · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-03vs Winner/Veltri - Gonzalez/ContreraLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatricia Sarmiento / Lory Strickland vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Samie Lesperance2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJodi Crespi / Teri DiGiulian vs Ana Carolina Manchester / Garbine de la Mora5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesClaudia Torres / Silvina Peloso vs Sigal Sasson / Audrey Gayle1-6, 3-6
2021-11-26vs Midtown - NickosonLost 02
L#1 DoublesYonghong Chen / Lory Strickland vs Lissette Loddo / Maria Escarra3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesValeria Cisneros / Silvina Peloso vs Jodi Skolnick / Maria Schaeuffler3-6, 4-6
2021-11-23vs Midtown - NickosonLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeri DiGiulian / Jodi Crespi vs Liz Sobel / Julie Jurman5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSilvina Peloso / Claudia Torres vs Fany Villarroel / Jodi Skolnick1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLory Strickland / Silvia Fonseca vs Maria Schaeuffler / Sarah Nickoson4-6, 2-6
2021-11-19vs Midtown - NickosonWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatricia Sarmiento / Lory Strickland vs Maria Moreno / Jodi Skolnick5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJodi Crespi / Claudia Torres vs Lissette Loddo / Maria Escarra6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-11-18vs Winner/Veltri - Gonzalez/ContreraLost 02
L#1 DoublesSilvia Fonseca / Silvina Peloso vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Elizabeth Smalley2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJodi Crespi / Teri DiGiulian vs Zorayda Hidalgo / Samie Lesperance1-6, 3-6
2021-09-24vs Winner/Veltri - Gonzalez/ContreraLost 03
L#1 DoublesJodi Crespi / Evelyn Daniels vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Sigal Sasson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClaudia Torres / Delia Bolanos vs Garbine de la Mora / Kerri Paul2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTeri DiGiulian / Lory Strickland vs Sara Boidi / Sara Contreras7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Lory Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Valeria Cisneros
published
3.21
Evelyn Daniels
published 3.5
3.19
Claudia Torres
published 3.5
3.15
Gloria McRae
published 3.5
3.13
Silvina Peloso
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Delia Bolanos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Teri DiGiulian
published
Jodi Crespi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lory Strickland
172W–118L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
Valeria Cisneros
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Evelyn Daniels
17W–17L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Claudia Torres
18W–26L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Gloria McRae
82W–81L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Silvina Peloso
52W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Delia Bolanos
77W–92L career · 1 line in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Teri DiGiulian
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Jodi Crespi
11W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.