Teams

GSCC BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-28vs CROWN SILVERLost 03
L#1 DoublesMike Theile / Michael Check vs Craig Moody / David Baugh0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRich Pavcek vs Marlin Rhodes2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Aldrich / Max Lee vs Bryan Snow / Howard Roney2-6, 4-6
2025-07-22vs CROWN SILVERLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Terkun / Michael Check vs Zach Stuart / Shawn Lawrence6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJeff Aldrich vs David Baugh1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMike Theile / Cameron Williams vs Robert Sanderson / Bryan Snow7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-15vs CROWN SILVERLost 02
L#1 DoublesCameron Williams / Mike Theile vs Craig Moody / Cotton Koehler2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Check vs Kipling Gomez2-6, 0-6
2025-07-08vs CROWN SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Terkun / Mike Theile vs Kipling Gomez / Craig Moody0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRich Pavcek vs Shawn Lawrence7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMax Lee / Paolo Richardson vs David Baugh / Cotton Koehler1-6, 1-6
2025-07-01vs CROWN SILVERWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Adams / Bert Chilson vs Howard Roney / Marlin Rhodes6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Check / Mark Terkun vs Bryan Snow / Robert Sanderson6-1, 7-5
2025-06-24vs CROWN SILVERLost 03
L#1 DoublesMike Theile / Michael Check vs Cotton Koehler / Zach Stuart4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPaolo Richardson vs Kipling Gomez2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRich Pavcek / Robert Adams vs Shawn Lawrence / Craig Moody4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Bert Chilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Mark Terkun
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Rich Pavcek
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Michael Check
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.99
Jeff Aldrich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Mike Theile
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Paolo Richardson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Terkun + Michael Check303 matchesnot enough data
Michael Check + Mike Theile033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bert Chilson
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Mark Terkun
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Rich Pavcek
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Michael Check
14W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jeff Aldrich
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Mike Theile
0W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paolo Richardson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.