Teams

BC-AltaVista/MasakoMizuno

2024 SO CAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Danay Holman
published 4.5
4.19
Ryan Hickman
published
4.15
Gloria Geller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Tammy Bayne
published
4.12
Michelle Dean
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.08
Mala Lee
published
4.04
Jennie Speciale
published
4.04
Masako Mizuno
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published 4.5
4.04
Anne Bayne
published 4.5
3.96
MINA RICABAR
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.94
Angelica Galvez-Deutsch
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.83
Martina Ricabar
published
Kaori Hirasawa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Dean + Tammy Bayne224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Danay Holman
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
4.47
Ryan Hickman
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Gloria Geller
139W–102L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
Tammy Bayne
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
4.13
Michelle Dean
81W–99L career · 6 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.12
Mala Lee
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
4.08
Jennie Speciale
3W–13L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Masako Mizuno
71W–68L career · 9 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Anne Bayne
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.04
4.5
MINA RICABAR
141W–103L career · 7 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.96
4
Angelica Galvez-Deutsch
135W–95L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Martina Ricabar
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.83
Kaori Hirasawa
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.