Teams

Slater/Memphis

2025 Adult 40 & Over-Memphis · 3.0 Women 40 & over

16 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-09vs Charping/MemphisLost 13
L#1 DoublesMicaela Cignetti / Dorothy Work vs Elizabeth Babcock / Kristen Corrigan2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Slater / Kimberly Hester vs Susan Charping / Claudia Ziegler2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSherene Katzman / Jamie Hunt vs Lauren Bloodworth / Jill Bishop6-3, 6-4
L#4 DoublesMelissa Fleenor / Tammy Drake vs Rachel Burford / Susan Gambrell1-6, 3-6
2025-03-25vs Myers/MemphisWon 40
W#1 DoublesKatherine Slater / Jaime Dietz vs Molly Beard / Mary Sexton6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Umansky / Jacqueline Carpenter vs Rebekah Sudduth / Martha Claybrook6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Slater / Sherene Katzman vs Amber McCabe / Krystal Shaw4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#4 DoublesJamie Hunt / Tammy Drake vs Anna Avant / Ashley Powers6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 40 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Jacqueline Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Jaime Dietz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Katherine Slater
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Micaela Cignetti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Dorothy Work
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Kimberly Hester
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Julie Umansky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Jamie Hunt
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Sherene Katzman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Tammy Drake
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Rebecca Slater
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Aimee Puryear
published 3
2.27
Melissa Fleenor
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Anna Durante
published 2.5
LaTreka Smith
published
Nadia Fares
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Umansky + Jamie Hunt134 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Hester + Rebecca Slater303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacqueline Carpenter
26W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Jaime Dietz
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Katherine Slater
19W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Micaela Cignetti
25W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
Dorothy Work
19W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Kimberly Hester
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Julie Umansky
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Jamie Hunt
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Sherene Katzman
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Tammy Drake
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Rebecca Slater
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Aimee Puryear
7W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.36
Melissa Fleenor
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.27
2.5
Anna Durante
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
LaTreka Smith
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nadia Fares
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.