Teams

Jones/Calhoun

2026 EVTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring '26 · Womens 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-26vs Patch/DellingerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJessica Dobash / Janelle Williams vs Amy Harrington / April Chastain2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesToni Blair / Kim Adair vs Tiffany Howerton / Toni Gaines7-6, 7-6
2026-03-24vs Fowler/CalhounSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSandra Copeland / Emily Mobbs vs Connie Quinn / Katie Moraitakis4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Kelm vs Monica Parker0-6, 0-6
2026-03-19vs Fowler/CalhounLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanelle Williams / Sandra Copeland vs Monica Parker / Celina Locke2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEmily Mobbs / Elizabeth Kelm vs Katie Moraitakis / Connie Quinn4-6, 4-6
2026-03-17vs Patch/DellingerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJessica Dobash / Janelle Williams vs Lori Patch / Toni Gaines1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEmily Mobbs vs Amy Hodges6-4, 6-2
2026-03-09vs Fowler/CalhounWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandra Copeland / Emily Mobbs vs Monica Parker / Celina Locke6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAnna George vs Connie Quinn6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKim Adair / Toni Blair vs Jennifer Massey / Katie Moraitakis4-6, 2-6
2026-03-05vs Patch/DellingerWon 20
W#1 DoublesSandra Copeland / Anna George vs Camille Abney / Stephonie Walker6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Kelm / Jessica Dobash vs Savannah Weeks / Lisa Morris4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Womens 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fowler/Calhoun3381020156
2Jones/Calhoun2481022167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Tina Jones
published
2.60
Anna George
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.58
Emily Mobbs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.44
Elizabeth Kelm
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.35
Kaley Fuller
published
2.07
Sandra Copeland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.91
Jessica Dobash
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.81
Toni Blair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sue Jacobson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Jones
11W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%12%88%
2.67
3
Anna George
9W–3L career · type D · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Emily Mobbs
14W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%27%73%
2.58
Elizabeth Kelm
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Kaley Fuller
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.35
Sandra Copeland
7W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Jessica Dobash
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Toni Blair
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Sue Jacobson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.