Teams

TeamForman2 (Riviera Prep)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-19vs Longa (Salvadore Park)Won 10
W#3 DoublesNathalia Blanco / Daniella Reynolds vs Elaine Rosner / Mariela Rojas6-4, 6-1
2023-02-22vs Etzold (Royal Palm)Won 10
W#1 SinglesMildred Rembisz vs ISABEL RICO PASTOR6-3, 6-4
2023-02-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesMildred Rembisz vs FIORELLA WESTRING6-0, 6-1
2023-02-08vs Fertel (Salvadore Park)Won 10
W#1 SinglesMildred Rembisz vs Paulina Escalante6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Nathalia Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.48
Elodie de Fabrique
published
3.48
Mildred Rembisz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Luisa Angel
published
3.33
Penelope Johnson
published
3.23
Jessica Arnesen
published
3.11
Paola Campanella
published
3.04
Gina Marinelli
published
Jane Forman
published
Jennifer Oliveira
published
Patricia Bowler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paola Campanella + Luisa Angel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nathalia Blanco
323W–115L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Elodie de Fabrique
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.48
Mildred Rembisz
118W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
Luisa Angel
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
Penelope Johnson
28W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
Jessica Arnesen
5W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Paola Campanella
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.11
Gina Marinelli
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.04
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Oliveira
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Bowler
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.