Teams

Sports Mall-Nelson

2023 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 3.5M

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-21vs Liberty Park Tennis-ArunLost 02
L#2 DoublesJOSEPH BROWN / Andrew Bliss vs Arunnatesh Muthukkumaraswamy / Mark Adams6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Finlay / Darren Nelson vs Edward Ekstrom / Bobby Cannon3-6, 3-6
2023-10-14vs South Jordan-LutzSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrew Bliss / Thad Smith vs Jesse Mangum / Philipp Schroeder4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDarren Nelson / Ryan Farr vs Randy Mimides / Coby Carter7-5, 6-4
2023-10-07vs Sunpro-TaylorLost 03
L#1 DoublesJOSEPH BROWN / Rick Scott vs M Vinson Miner / David McGill1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesZach England vs Michael Olson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThad Smith / Andrew Bliss vs Michael Hall / Daniel George6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-09-23vs Sports Mall-PehrsonSplit 11
W#1 SinglesZach England vs Rich Gurr6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrew Finlay / Todd Woods vs Timothy Gribben / Lonny Pehrson4-6, 2-6
2023-09-16vs Sports Mall-LudlowLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Finlay / Todd Woods vs Justin Deputy / Zachary Wofford2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Farr vs Yadu Bhardwaj1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRick Scott / JOSEPH BROWN vs David Ludlow / Matthew Wisdom7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2023-09-09vs Salt Lake Tennis-Riding/PatrickLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Finlay / Todd Woods vs Milad Sefiddashti / Donald Bayna6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesZach England vs Tam Vu3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRick Scott / Darren Nelson vs Justin Bracken / Ben Jones3-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesRyan Farr / Rick Scott vs Brad DeHaan / Bryan DeHaan1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTodd Woods vs Clarke Nelson2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Thomas Good
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Andrew Finlay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Rick Scott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Todd Woods
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
JOSEPH BROWN
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.14
Matthew Heller
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Andrew Bliss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Thad Smith
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.01
Ryan Farr
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.55
Darren Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
Jeff Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Zach England
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Farr + Thad Smith8165% games+10.3% vs expected
Matthew Heller + Thomas Good5362% games+8.4% vs expected
Ryan Farr + Darren Nelson161049% games+4.6% vs expected
Thad Smith + Jeff Henderson181750% games+3.3% vs expected
Jeff Henderson + JOSEPH BROWN3651% games+3.2% vs expected
Andrew Finlay + Todd Woods121547% games−3.1% vs expected
Darren Nelson + Jeff Henderson0632% games−4.1% vs expected
Andrew Bliss + JOSEPH BROWN0538% games−6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Good
61W–24L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Andrew Finlay
106W–114L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Rick Scott
61W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Todd Woods
47W–100L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
JOSEPH BROWN
139W–114L career · 7 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
Matthew Heller
65W–55L career · 9 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Andrew Bliss
117W–162L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Thad Smith
116W–73L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.05
Ryan Farr
107W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Darren Nelson
102W–121L career · 10 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Jeff Henderson
101W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Zach England
26W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.