Teams

CGardner/Siens (Life Time)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-11vs DBrantmeyer (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKevin Zhang / Nate Siens vs Jon Michael Thomas / James Nichols6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-06vs DBrantmeyer (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTim Melton / Nate Siens vs Daniel Nunn / Jon Michael Thomas2-6, 3-6
2023-03-30vs MBoyce (Veterans Park)Won 20
W#2 DoublesRoger Gum / Joseph Heyward vs Rahul Ramkumar / Robert Mallard6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesNate Siens vs Brett Mitchell6-0, 6-0
2023-03-16vs MChaney (Raintree)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew VanDerveer / Roger Gum vs Chris Estridge / Lee Pisacano7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesNate Siens vs Scott Simon0-6, 0-6
2023-03-16vs RGogate (Blakeney)Won 10
W#3 DoublesNate Siens / Tim Melton vs Naveen Sharma / Sourav Basu6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Christopher Gardner
published 4.5
3.78
Nate Siens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.74
Charles Manning
published 4
3.72
Tim Melton
published
3.67
Roger Gum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Jordan Teel
published
Franklin Lim
published
Graham Webster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nate Siens + Roger Gum3255% gamesnot enough data
Tim Melton + Roger Gum213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Gardner
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
4
Nate Siens
165W–75L career · 10 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Andrew VanDerveer
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Charles Manning
15W–18L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Tim Melton
27W–13L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Roger Gum
143W–81L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Jordan Teel
20W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.61
Franklin Lim
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Graham Webster
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.