Teams

ABecker (JCC)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Men - Tues PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-01vs JChung (Life Time)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNeill Burris / Richard Williamson vs Claude Underwood / Leon Banchik7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-24vs MHenninger (Raintree)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNeill Burris / James Deerkoski vs Mark Fiddes / Mike Henninger4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-09-22vs BGibson (WSRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNeill Burris / Richard Williamson vs Sijo Joseph / Eloy ROY4-6, 4-6
2024-09-10vs PTighe (Blakeney)Won 10
W#3 DoublesNeill Burris / Richard Williamson vs Brian Hegner / Indranil Bhattacharya6-3, 6-4
2024-09-03vs TFarley (Park Crossing)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNeill Burris / James Deerkoski vs Keith Lowe / Matthew Merkel2-6, 6-7
2024-08-27vs FGrindle (Weddington)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNeill Burris / James Deerkoski vs Alberto Botero / Clarke Hobson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-06vs KFranks (PPRSC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesSteve Lepow / Neill Burris vs Trevor Zimmer / David Moore7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Neill Burris
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.08
Greg Hobby
published
3.05
John Haviland
published
2.96
Anthony Hyde
published 3
2.87
Perry Pao
published
2.83
Kevin Woods
published
2.80
Richard Williamson
published
2.71
Jeff Weiss
published
2.69
Jeff Morse
published
2.66
George Cronson
published
Ron Hunte
published
Steve Lepow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Cronson + Kevin Woods224 matchesnot enough data
Neill Burris + Jeff Weiss123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Neill Burris
35W–71L career · 7 lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
3.09
Greg Hobby
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
John Haviland
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Anthony Hyde
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.96
Perry Pao
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Kevin Woods
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Richard Williamson
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Jeff Weiss
2W–14L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Jeff Morse
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
George Cronson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
Ron Hunte
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Lepow
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.