Teams

Southern: Rye Racquet Club

2023 18&Over Mixed · 9.0

23 players · average NTRP 4.57 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-02-04vs Chestnut Ridge - MixologySplit 11
W#1 DoublesEnrique Catter / Erin Harris vs Liam Berkowitz / Ally Shaule3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarc Jennings / Chiara Ciabatti vs James Koob / Joi Musikar4-6, 5-7
2023-01-21vs Vista: Straight Outta VistaWon 21
W#1 DoublesLewis Ferrer Pena / Erin Harris vs Phillip Rehg / Sadie Shackelford6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesNeeladitya Roy / Allison Gibbs vs Aditya Mukund Subramanian / Laura Emerson1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEdyta Cieplucha / Marc Jennings vs Helen Chun / Robert Chun6-2, 6-3
2023-01-15vs Sportime Lake IsleWon 30
W#1 DoublesEnrique Catter / Kate Jennings vs Jorge Wilmer / Nicole Gassman6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJohanna Olsborg / Mark Schlecker vs Darnell Caballes / Angelica Mattschei6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHenry Walsh / Edina Jung vs David Goode / Cintia Shiro6-4, 6-4
2022-12-10vs Vista: Straight Outta VistaWon 30
W#1 DoublesLewis Ferrer Pena / Fiona Strachan vs Haydn Palliser / Carole Allers6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesIngrid Lopp / Mark Schlecker vs Allison Greenberg / Brett Howard7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarc Jennings / Chiara Ciabatti vs Craig Spenner / Xiaoran Liang6-3, 6-0
2022-12-03vs Chestnut Ridge - MixologyWon 10
W#2 DoublesNeeladitya Roy / Edina Jung vs Margaret Randazzo / James Koob4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-11-20vs Yonkers: Happy Hour AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohanna Olsborg / Lewis Ferrer Pena vs Amy Hamlin / Juan Franco7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesFiona Strachan / Devin Wakeford vs Tara Ware / Wilson Paul3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEdyta Cieplucha / Marc Jennings vs Tara Blanchard / Ogbonna Chilaka1-6, 4-6
2022-11-06vs Sportime Lake IsleWon 30
W#1 DoublesClinton DeVries / Julie Shropshire vs Nicole Gassman / David Goode6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHenry Walsh / Fiona Strachan vs Suzy Huang / Jorge Wilmer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarc Jennings / Edyta Cieplucha vs Darnell Caballes / Angelica Mattschei6-3, 6-2
2022-10-29vs Vista: Straight Outta VistaWon 30
W#1 DoublesKate Jennings / Clinton DeVries vs Helen Chun / Thomas Youn6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEdina Jung / Neeladitya Roy vs Mary Mondello / Jeremy Goldberg6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAllison Gibbs / Henry Walsh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-22vs Chestnut Ridge - MixologyWon 10
W#1 DoublesChiara Ciabatti / Tobias Glitterstam vs Jorrie Bruffett / Brad Breakstone6-1, 6-3
2022-10-16vs Yonkers: Happy Hour AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohanna Olsborg / Clinton DeVries vs Amy Untch / Evan Pan6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChiara Ciabatti / Tobias Glitterstam vs Katharina Lewis / John Cassas6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKate Jennings / Devin Wakeford vs Alexa Goldberg / Ogbonna Chilaka3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southern: Rye Racquet Club01026415215
2Yonkers: Happy Hour Aces010171331279
3Chestnut Ridge - Mixology010121738294

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.74
Chiara Ciabatti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.69
Clinton DeVries
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.63
Devin Wakeford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.56
Neeladitya Roy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.52
Enrique Catter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.37
Carolyn Cruz
published 4.5
4.27
Mark Schlecker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Ingrid Lopp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Felix Yamasato
published
3.95
Kate Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.91
Erin Harris
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Carolina Johnson
published 4
3.72
Allison Gibbs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Marc Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Edina Jung
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Edyta Cieplucha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Fiona Strachan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Henry Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Johanna Olsborg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Cramer
published
Julie Shropshire
published
Lewis Ferrer Pena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tobias Glitterstam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Harris + Neeladitya Roy6157% games+8.5% vs expected
Chiara Ciabatti + Tobias Glitterstam15267% gamesnot enough data
Marc Jennings + Chiara Ciabatti6849% gamesnot enough data
Clinton DeVries + Chiara Ciabatti7257% gamesnot enough data
Edina Jung + Neeladitya Roy7164% gamesnot enough data
Devin Wakeford + Kate Jennings4450% gamesnot enough data
Henry Walsh + Chiara Ciabatti5158% gamesnot enough data
Henry Walsh + Kate Jennings5166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Chiara Ciabatti
85W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.74
5
Clinton DeVries
62W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.69
5
Devin Wakeford
31W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.63
Neeladitya Roy
45W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.56
Enrique Catter
30W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.52
4.5
Carolyn Cruz
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Mark Schlecker
103W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
Ingrid Lopp
78W–53L career · 1 line in 2023
no projection at this level
4.25
Felix Yamasato
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
Kate Jennings
99W–102L career · 2 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
Erin Harris
213W–76L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Carolina Johnson
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Allison Gibbs
177W–169L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Marc Jennings
38W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Edina Jung
118W–61L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Edyta Cieplucha
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Fiona Strachan
84W–68L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Henry Walsh
82W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Johanna Olsborg
42W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Cramer
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Shropshire
33W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lewis Ferrer Pena
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tobias Glitterstam
29W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.