Teams

JLocke/MMcKinstry (Raintree)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-06vs MWeaver/Cook (PCC)Won 31
L#1 DoublesTheresa Nobles / Suzy Owens vs Whitney Vineyard / Kimberley Eudy6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDagmar Dohmen vs Jennie Cook6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanet Locke / Megan Bishop Quirk vs Windy Polites / Jamie Davies5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBonnie Sheppard / Janis Behymer vs Melissa Weaver / Sylvia Walker7-5, 6-1
2022-04-29vs STroni (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Anthony / Daphne Katz vs Alyce Lofgren / Julie Adams3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniela Pagano / Robin Estridge vs Kathleen Clark / Marise Kumar6-3, 6-0
2022-04-22vs WYoung/JCugliari (BCC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Chase / Theresa Nobles vs Angie Brogdon / Christine Wade2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDaphne Katz vs Kandi Jackson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Locke / Janis Behymer vs Ami Stein / Patti Zakow1-6, 2-6
2022-04-15vs MSchrimsher (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Locke / Daniela Pagano vs Mollie James / Ellen Smith3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSuzy Owens vs Ashley Barton2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Nobles / Daphne Katz vs Margaret Schrimsher / Joe-Anne Saldarini3-6, 1-6
2022-04-08vs SPierle (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDagmar Dohmen / Daniela Pagano vs Cindi Helms / Cynthia Waldrop6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaria McKinstry / Janis Behymer vs Ashley Bowles / Trista Holwager1-6, 3-6
2022-03-25vs SHicks/Erwin (Carmel)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniela Pagano / Janet Locke vs Brook Edwards / Suzannah Hicks4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSuzy Owens vs Lindy Gignac6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJanis Behymer / Rachel Hallsten vs Megan Gilson / Molly Morris3-6, 3-6
2022-03-11vs DBach/KDiaz (Col Beatty)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Locke / Daphne Katz vs Diane Bach / Kimberly Diaz1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDagmar Dohmen vs Fumiyo Ono3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBonnie Sheppard / Robin Estridge vs Julie Grahl / Beth Flickinger2-6, 1-6
2022-03-04vs LCrutchfield (Quail Hollow)Won 21
L#1 DoublesDaphne Katz / Theresa Nobles vs Malinda Gill / Michele Cooper3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesDagmar Dohmen vs Lynn Crutchfield6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobin Estridge / Bonnie Sheppard vs Annie Totten / Sarah Pearce6-3, 6-1
2022-02-25vs RSimons (Charlotte Country Club)Won 20
W#1 SinglesSuzy Owens vs CT Anderson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanis Behymer / Robin Estridge vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-18vs CJensen (Ballantyne)Won 20
W#2 DoublesJanet Locke / Daniela Pagano vs Chantal Powers / Tiffani Wagner6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSuzy Owens / Theresa Nobles vs Cheryl Jensen / Dori Cazorla6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Dagmar Dohmen
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Barbara Chase
published 4
3.62
Bonnie Sheppard
published 3.5
3.55
Janet Locke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Daniela Pagano
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.46
Suzy Owens
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.46
Maria McKinstry
published
3.41
Daphne Katz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Theresa Nobles
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.36
Janis Behymer
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Robin Estridge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Megan Bishop Quirk
published
Rachel Hallsten
published
Susan Anthony
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniela Pagano + Janet Locke4354% games+2.0% vs expected
Theresa Nobles + Janet Locke8356% games+1.2% vs expected
Theresa Nobles + Janis Behymer3549% games−6.0% vs expected
Theresa Nobles + Daphne Katz5846% games−6.6% vs expected
Maria McKinstry + Janet Locke1735% games−8.7% vs expected
Maria McKinstry + Barbara Chase2442% games−11.3% vs expected
Janis Behymer + Janet Locke2541% gamesnot enough data
Daniela Pagano + Daphne Katz4255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dagmar Dohmen
17W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Barbara Chase
3W–14L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Bonnie Sheppard
9W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.62
4
Janet Locke
46W–69L career · 6 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Daniela Pagano
153W–109L career · 5 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Suzy Owens
18W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.46
Maria McKinstry
9W–20L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Daphne Katz
24W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Theresa Nobles
31W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Janis Behymer
36W–41L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Robin Estridge
27W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Megan Bishop Quirk
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Hallsten
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Anthony
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.