Teams

SFV - Triple Doubles

2025 Adult 40+ Weekday SFV · SFV 40+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-02vs SFV - Sets In The City 3.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCatherine Haggett vs Jennifer Williams2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Kerr-Orlik / Vicki Weinstein vs Dalia Sedra / Vanessa Mitchell6-7, 6-7
2025-04-01vs SFV - FireballsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCatherine Haggett vs Arianne Rudes6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesChristine Steele / Deborah Kerr-Orlik vs Judy Scheer / Adele Slaughter4-6, 2-6
2025-03-24vs SFV - Spin DivasSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRobin Fishman / Deborah Kerr-Orlik vs Jennifer Bevan / Cindy Shih2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristine de la Hoz / Catherine Haggett vs Consuelo Hayden / Lisa Gubicza6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesCatherine Haggett / Tara Sickmeier vs Katy Burgess / Jo Ann Thrailkill6-7, 5-4, 0-1
2025-03-20vs SFV - String TheoryWon 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Haggett / Christine de la Hoz vs Hope Jones / Raymi Schwartz6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAimee Alejandre / Angela Bladon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-28vs SFV - Love GamesLost 01
L#1 DoublesAimee Alejandre / Robin Fishman vs Esther Hwang / Susan Lee2-6, 2-6
2025-01-31vs SFV - Love 2 AceWon 10
W#1 SinglesCatherine Haggett vs Angelina Smith7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesTara Sickmeier / Catherine Haggett vs Julie Stubington / Lisa Cloughesy4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAimee Alejandre / Madi Rosenberg vs Goli Afshari / Edita Leifer6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Aimee Alejandre
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.45
Brooke Levy
published 3.5
3.42
Christine Daniel
published 3.5
3.35
Catherine Haggett
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Christine Steele
published 3.5
3.19
Mina Yang
published
3.15
Christine de la Hoz
published 3.5
3.14
Madi Rosenberg
published
3.13
Vicki Weinstein
published
2.99
Deborah Kerr-Orlik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.71
Alexi Fine
published 3
Jennifer Lerner
published
Robin Fishman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mina Yang + Christine de la Hoz314 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Levy + Christine de la Hoz033 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Kerr-Orlik + Catherine Haggett033 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Kerr-Orlik + Christine Steele033 matchesnot enough data
Christine Daniel + Madi Rosenberg303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aimee Alejandre
81W–75L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
3.5
Brooke Levy
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Christine Daniel
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Catherine Haggett
99W–122L career · 14 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Christine Steele
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Mina Yang
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.19
3.5
Christine de la Hoz
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Madi Rosenberg
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Vicki Weinstein
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Deborah Kerr-Orlik
57W–134L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Alexi Fine
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Jennifer Lerner
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robin Fishman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.