Teams

Ledray: Racq Pack

2026 MIXED 18 & OVER EARLY START · 7.0 MX (FRI)

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-19vs Nasrabadi: Mr. & Miss HitsLost 02
L#1 DoublesTimothy Finnerty / EDLYN KROENING vs Jonathan Sembrano / Grace Frazier1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStuart Wahlstrom / Luisa Wahlstrom vs Charlyn Francisco / Paul Bennett7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-12-12vs Richards: Fall The ReplacementsLost 12
L#1 DoublesTimothy Finnerty / Brigitte Schiller vs Scott Dean / Rachel Reese3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLeigh Carlson / EDLYN KROENING vs Helena Seidel / Justin Webster6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStuart Wahlstrom / Luisa Wahlstrom vs Wendy Richards / Tyler Karabinus4-6, 2-6
2025-11-28vs Fermstad: LakeVillains MXLost 12
L#1 DoublesEDLYN KROENING / Patrick Ledray vs Catherine Hosamane / Jo Janssens2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Hultman / John Genz vs Lori Powell-Knutson / Scott Lundquist3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesStuart Wahlstrom / Luisa Wahlstrom vs Cathleen Maloney / Matthew Maloney6-1, 7-6
2025-11-21vs ChandlerLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Genz / Brigitte Schiller vs Cindy Altendahl / Jim Altendahl6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Fontaine / Verena van Fleet vs Bill Blaine / Nancy Garrett7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPatrick Ledray / Kathleen Hultman vs Curtis Chandler / Susan Volin4-6, 3-6
2025-11-14vs All About That BaischLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeff Fontaine / Kathleen Hultman vs Rachel Lund / Shane Funfar6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStuart Wahlstrom / Luisa Wahlstrom vs Lindsay Ruppert / David Martin4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLeigh Carlson / Verena van Fleet vs Dominic Johnson / Amy Fishman7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-10-31vs Ostlund Per-Shaped 7.0 ES26Split 11
L#1 DoublesStuart Wahlstrom / Luisa Wahlstrom vs Jov Tuplano / Jennifer Christie1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVerena van Fleet / Timothy Finnerty vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-29vs Lewis/Bartz ES Mixed 7.0 18+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Genz / Brigitte Schiller vs Amanda Herr / Rick Jerz2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStuart Wahlstrom / Luisa Wahlstrom vs Emily Arndt / Jon Sticha6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeff Fontaine / Kathleen Hultman vs Kim Bartz / Charles Sunderland6-3, 6-2
2025-10-10vs Tang: Ball Don't Lie ES26Won 21
L#1 DoublesJeff Fontaine / Kathleen Hultman vs Megan Graebel / Kyle Syverson3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJohn Genz / Brigitte Schiller vs Melania Abdella / Scott Abdella7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTimothy Finnerty / EDLYN KROENING vs Lydia Nguyen / Alexander Tang6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MX (FRI) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Jeff Fontaine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
John Genz
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
EDLYN KROENING
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Brigitte Schiller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Verena van Fleet
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Kathleen Hultman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.85
Luisa Wahlstrom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Leigh Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Patrick Ledray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Stuart Wahlstrom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Timothy Finnerty
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Genz + Kathleen Hultman2545% games+4.3% vs expected
Verena van Fleet + John Genz3349% games−3.1% vs expected
Stuart Wahlstrom + Luisa Wahlstrom6948% gamesnot enough data
John Genz + Brigitte Schiller3264% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Fontaine + Verena van Fleet224 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Fontaine + Kathleen Hultman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Fontaine
41W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.90
John Genz
62W–41L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.73
EDLYN KROENING
36W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Brigitte Schiller
34W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Verena van Fleet
26W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kathleen Hultman
49W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Luisa Wahlstrom
59W–58L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Leigh Carlson
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patrick Ledray
10W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stuart Wahlstrom
17W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Timothy Finnerty
28W–40L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.