Teams

CK BLUE

2023 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-02vs NJ BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Bebber / Thomas Lich vs Bonita Thistle / Brian Messer2-6, 3-6
2023-06-25vs KC-CC REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesThomas Lich / Anita Kinder vs Kim Rachwalski / Ron Dart6-3, 6-0
2023-06-21vs LEBTC TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnita Kinder / Thomas Lich vs Kristie Gill / Scott Alvarez2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-06-11vs LEBTC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Bebber / Thomas Lich vs Manu Sharma / Catherine Zeberlein4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-05-28vs PH GREENSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDavid Frederick / Karen Bebber vs Beth Wright / Richard Wright6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesThomas Lich / Anita Kinder vs Peter Whitmore / Elizabeth Whitmore3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-21vs NJ PURPLELost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Bebber / David Frederick vs Jim Burgert / Julie Lochner1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Ken Reed
published
3.37
Thomas Pott
published
3.10
Anita Kinder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Thomas Lich
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.91
Karen Bebber
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Alisa Pott
published 3
2.61
Sandy Reed
published
Stephanie Courtney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Reed + Sandy Reed51041% games−3.8% vs expected
Alisa Pott + Thomas Pott1931% games−14.7% vs expected
Thomas Lich + Anita Kinder314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Reed
21W–36L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Thomas Pott
3W–27L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.37
3.5
Anita Kinder
77W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Thomas Lich
61W–81L career · 5 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Karen Bebber
44W–48L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Alisa Pott
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
Sandy Reed
17W–24L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
Stephanie Courtney
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.