Teams

JOHNSON RANCH 18MX7.0C

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Josh Sarpotdar
published
3.70
Kris Jornlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Paul Sasaura
published
3.68
Jennie Parker
published
3.59
Tracy Gillis
published
3.58
Vivi Zhang
published
3.58
Tatiana Hager
published
3.48
Joel Pe
published
3.43
Josef Tamory
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Greg Cho
published
3.40
Carli Fuchs
published 3.5
3.34
George Spencer
published
3.21
Kelly Weinberg
published
3.18
Margie Sasaura
published
3.15
Lori Grbac
published
3.14
Kateryna Elitzin
published
3.05
Eugene Echavez III
published
2.96
Peter Jaskowiak
published
2.89
Harry Weinberg
published
Joe Morales
published
Lilly Ko
published
Skylar Roper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margie Sasaura + Paul Sasaura5257% gamesnot enough data
Greg Cho + Vivi Zhang213 matchesnot enough data
Jennie Parker + Harry Weinberg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angelina Eidemeiller
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Josh Sarpotdar
11W–19L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Kris Jornlin
18W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Paul Sasaura
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Jennie Parker
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Tracy Gillis
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Vivi Zhang
24W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
Tatiana Hager
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Joel Pe
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Josef Tamory
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Greg Cho
34W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Carli Fuchs
23W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
George Spencer
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Kelly Weinberg
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Margie Sasaura
25W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Lori Grbac
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Kateryna Elitzin
31W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Eugene Echavez III
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Peter Jaskowiak
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Harry Weinberg
20W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Joe Morales
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lilly Ko
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Skylar Roper
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.