Teams

CSRC MCPHERSON

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesDoug Baker / William Asiano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-19vs LTFCS URBINAWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Bisanti / William Asiano vs Brandon Chanco / Josh Swenson6-2, 6-4
2021-05-12vs CCW MAILLOUXLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Bisanti / Doug Baker vs Lee Wolfe / John Whipple6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesTony Adkison vs Eric Burns3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJeff Kulich / James McPherson vs George York / George Argos5-7, 1-6
2021-05-05vs FLYHS JONESSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTony Adkison / Jeff Kulich vs James Fradette / Tan Nguyen0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesWilliam Asiano vs Steve Jones3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-04-28vs LTFCS URBINAWon 20
W#1 DoublesTony Adkison / Doug Baker vs Dominic D'Silva / Iain Bisset6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Bisanti / William Asiano vs Fernando Urbina / Brandon Chanco6-0, 7-5
2021-04-21vs CCW MAILLOUXLost 03
L#1 DoublesTony Adkison / Doug Baker vs Peter St. Clair / David StClair6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames McPherson / Daniel Bisanti vs Lee Wolfe / John Johlfs1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Kulich / William Asiano vs Daniel Michon / John Whipple4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
William Asiano
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.50
Daniel Bisanti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.45
Tony Adkison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.31
Jeff Kulich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
James McPherson
published 4
Andy Robbins
published
Bassam Chedid
published
David Leedy
published
Doug Baker
published
Robert Provost
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Baker + Tony Adkison4354% games−6.4% vs expected
Tony Adkison + William Asiano3745% games−14.1% vs expected
William Asiano + Daniel Bisanti3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Asiano
53W–75L career · 5 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Daniel Bisanti
69W–39L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.50
4
Tony Adkison
56W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Jeff Kulich
21W–33L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
4
James McPherson
5W–25L career · type S · no lines in 2021
95%5%<1%
3.29
Andy Robbins
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Bassam Chedid
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
David Leedy
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Doug Baker
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Provost
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.