Teams

Huchet

2021 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Combined

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-15vs RusickWon 20
W#1 DoublesVictoria Zielinski / Michael Arceneaux vs Felice Rolnick / Matthew Hodge6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSeverine Huchet / Guillaume Huchet vs Lotta Fox / Philip Kammann6-4, 6-1
2021-08-08vs RusickWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Arceneaux / Kelly Johnston vs Paul Reiss / Felice Rolnick6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesScott Sutter / Anne Dressel Sutter vs Lotta Fox / Sam Shouldis7-6
2021-07-25vs RusickWon 20
W#1 DoublesSeverine Huchet / Guillaume Huchet vs Dana Metzger / Paul Reiss7-5, 6-5
W#2 DoublesMichael Arceneaux / Kelly Johnston vs Sabina Garfinkel / Philip Kammann6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2021-07-11vs RusickSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Arceneaux / Victoria Zielinski vs Stephen Kadyk / Allie Zumwalt6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnne Dressel Sutter / Scott Sutter vs Cynthia Behr / Matthew Hodge3-6, 6-7
2021-06-29vs RusickWon 21
W#1 DoublesSeverine Huchet / Guillaume Huchet vs Sam Shouldis / Connie Weiss6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid LaFevers / Alexis Payne vs Cynthia Behr / Philip Kammann4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Arceneaux / Victoria Zielinski vs Charles Welton / Felice Rolnick6-0, 6-0
2021-06-27vs RusickWon 21
W#1 DoublesSeverine Huchet / Guillaume Huchet vs Allie Zumwalt / Stephen Kadyk6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Arceneaux / Kelly Johnston vs Paul Reiss / Dana Metzger6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesScott Sutter / Anne Dressel Sutter vs Philip Kammann / Sabina Garfinkel1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 9.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Huchet6011715148

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Victoria Zielinski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.33
Guillaume Huchet
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.32
Kelly Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.26
Severine Huchet
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.16
Scott Sutter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.93
Anne Dressel Sutter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
David LaFevers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Severine Huchet + Guillaume Huchet29958% games−2.4% vs expected
Scott Sutter + Anne Dressel Sutter101742% games−7.2% vs expected
Guillaume Huchet + Victoria Zielinski303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Zielinski
124W–34L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Guillaume Huchet
153W–77L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
4.33
Kelly Johnston
90W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
4.32
Severine Huchet
179W–68L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
4.26
Scott Sutter
65W–59L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Anne Dressel Sutter
17W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
3.93
David LaFevers
10W–20L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.